The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How to stop being the bottleneck in your AI workflow
Executive overview
Most people get stuck at AI phase one: learning to prompt better. The real leverage comes from making your business AI-native — adapting your processes and documentation so AI can operate with less of you in the loop.
Three bottlenecks keep you stuck: you hold the memory, you route the files, you check the outputs. Each can be systematically removed.
You are the bottleneck — not your prompts, not the model.
The three phases of AI adoption
- Phase 1 — adopting tools: prompting, context management, choosing the right feature
- Phase 2 — AI-native: adapting processes and documentation for AI
- Phase 3 — automation: AI handles entire functions autonomously
- Most people stall at phase 1 and never progress
Shift 1: externalise your memory
- Anything still in your head is unavailable to AI: client preferences, pricing changes, your boss's definition of "keep it tight"
- System instructions prime the AI before it does anything — update them with preferences and context
- Knowledge base holds files the AI references: templates, process docs, preferred formats
- Both are static — you must update them manually
- Memory files (dynamic): only available in Claude Code, Claude Cowork, or Codex (OpenAI) — tools that can read and write files across sessions
- These self-update as AI learns; the tool becomes a compounding asset, not just a utility
Shift 2: remove yourself as the file router
- Copying and pasting files into chat apps is slow and capped — typically 10 files maximum
- Bring the AI to the files, not the files to the AI
- Drop all relevant files into a folder; use Claude Code, Claude Cowork, or Codex to process them in bulk
- One-off use case: drop 50 client transcripts into a folder, ask AI to extract wins, losses, and upsell opportunities in one pass
- Ongoing use case: add each new meeting transcript to the folder; AI auto-processes it and updates the shared knowledge base
- Requires a
CLAUDE.md(for Claude tools) oragents.md(for Codex) instruction file in the same folder
Structure of a CLAUDE.md or agents.md file
- What's here: describe the folder layout and file types so AI knows the lay of the land
- Tasks: define what AI should do when triggered — validate an idea, process a new transcript, update summary files
- Self-update rule: instruct AI to update the instruction file itself when new files are added, keeping the context current
Shift 3: externalise your standards so AI checks itself
- High-risk tasks still need human review; this applies to repetitive, lower-stakes outputs
- Define quality as binary criteria — yes/no, pass/fail — so AI can self-evaluate
- Example checklist for an executive meeting summary:
- Opens with a reference to the previous meeting
- Total length under 200 words
- All action items have deadlines
- Every paragraph leads with the key point
- If you don't know what good looks like, give AI 5–10 strong examples and ask it to extract patterns, then convert each pattern into a yes/no evaluation question
- Embed the resulting checklist in system instructions with this instruction: "Before delivering the final output, evaluate against this checklist. If anything fails, revise and recheck until all criteria pass."
- This is earned trust, not blind trust — as reliability is proven, human review can reduce
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.