The original is one click away. Open original ↗
AI's impact on marketing, media, and consumer behavior
Executive overview
AI is not comparable to NFTs — it is infrastructure-level technology, more like electricity than a speculative asset class. The marketing industry is early and largely unprepared. Algorithms are already the most consequential AI force in advertising, yet the industry is focused elsewhere.
Brands that draw hard lines against generative AI today will quietly cross them within a generation when competitive pressure forces their hand.
AI adoption follows the electricity arc, not the NFT arc
- Electricity was demonized when it first appeared — people believed demons lived in it; AI fear follows the same pattern
- NFTs were a speculative format built on top of blockchain; AI is oxygen — pervasive, not a format
- Adoption will slow-build like social media, not spike-and-crash like NFTs
- Blockchain's provenance use case becomes critical as deepfakes proliferate — stamping content origin before publishing it to the internet
- Within 8-10 years, the default assumption will shift from "every video is real" to "every video may be fake"
- Gen Alpha will likely grow up without knowing what a search engine is, the way under-25s today don't know the Yellow Pages
The "and" principle — human art and generative art coexist
- Canvas art was once considered fake art compared to wall murals — the same argument now applies to AI-generated content
- Auto-Tune and EDM were attacked the same way; both are now mainstream
- The consumer decides what counts as art, not the artist — 8 billion people's behavior outweighs the opinions of creators
- GaryVee intends to use AI to make music despite not being able to sing, betting that hooks and bars can be written and AI handles the rest
- Brands drawing hard lines (e.g. Dove's no-generative-humans policy) are well-intentioned but will face competitive pressure to reverse course
- Dove's stance will likely not survive 35 years — no brand will accept permanent competitive disadvantage
Algorithms are the AI story Madison Avenue is missing
- The For You page algorithm is the most significant AI already affecting the marketing industry — not generative tools
- Madison Avenue is a sales and marketing culture, not a deep-technology culture; most brands don't have their heads around gen AI yet
- VaynerMedia's current recommendation to clients: don't make an official statement yet — it's too early
- Copyright and trademark liability is a hard blocker for full generative production; indemnifying clients against IP claims (e.g. Disney) is unresolved
- Food brands refusing gen AI for food imagery while accepting it elsewhere — yet traditional food styling in ads has always been more deceptive than anything AI produces
Media fragmentation and the collapse of shared culture
- Pre-social media, people chose Fox or CNN, NYT or Post — fragmentation existed but options were fewer
- In peak cable, the average household watched only 3 channels out of 36 — choice was always exercised narrowly
- Now fragmentation is so extreme that coworkers may share zero cultural references
- MASH as a shared experience has been replaced by 87 separate clips that add up to MASH — same genre, zero synchrony
- Loneliness is a real downstream risk of fragmentation at scale
- The correction requires individuals choosing curiosity and selflessness — engaging with others' interests, not just their own
Brands and personalized advertising at scale
- Streaming TV and individual-level data make it theoretically possible to generate thousands of ad variants tailored per viewer
- VaynerMedia is exploring this but will not go full generative AI in production until copyright and trademark law is clearer
- The 30-second TV spot broadcast model is already delusional given actual fragmentation
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.