The original is one click away. Open original ↗
One message wins: eliminate conjunctions to sharpen copy clarity
Executive overview
Most copy fails because it tries to say too many things at once. Every time you add "and", "but", "or", or a comma joining ideas, you dilute your message and lose a reader.
The fix is a single-sweep editing technique: highlight every conjunction and comma in your copy, then challenge each one. Keep only those that are structurally necessary. Cut or choose between the rest.
One strong message remembered beats three diluted messages forgotten.
Why conjunctions weaken copy
- A reader's brain holds one thing at a time — one message lands; multiple messages compete
- Using "and" to join messages signals you haven't decided which one matters most
- Adding more messages feels safer but reduces the chance anyone acts on any of them
- Every conjunction is a decision you've avoided making for your reader
The conjunction sweep
- During your editing pass, highlight every instance of: and, but, or, or a list comma
- Then return to each highlight and ask: does removing this improve or weaken the sentence?
- Most will be cut; some are structurally necessary and can stay
When conjunctions are acceptable
- Relational necessity: "between you and me" — the sentence breaks without it
- Timeline sequence: "I got a coffee and drank it" — implies "and then", is clear and efficient
- Intentional list supporting one idea: listing features that all prove the same single benefit
The Drift example
- Drift's headline — "revenue acceleration platform" — is strong and focused
- Their subhead added: increase revenue, shorten sales cycles, and strengthen brand — three separate ideas
- "Strengthen brand" is off-message; it doesn't support revenue acceleration
- Cutting to "increase your revenue" alone is bolder, clearer, and more memorable
- "Create pipeline and accelerate revenue" may be a timeline — if so, express it as one outcome or sequence, not a list
- When visuals, animations, and text compete for attention, multiple messages guarantee none land
Talking clients through single-message discipline
- Clients often push to add more — "we also save them money, we also make them money"
- Each addition feels like value; each addition dilutes the core argument
- Write the hell out of one message and people will actually believe it
- Present the before/after: once they see the cut version, they rarely miss what was removed
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.