The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Moving from consuming leadership content to practising it
Executive overview
Many leaders absorb books and podcasts without changing their behaviour. The gap is structural: there is no mechanism to force action, reflection, or accountability.
Steve Schroeder, a pharmacy district manager, describes how a combination of self-assessment, deliberate practice, and peer accountability closed that gap. He shifted from directing teams to coaching them — and from resisting organisational change to leading it.
The move from theory to practice requires a system that forces action, not just exposure.
Breaking out of a career plateau
- Reached the ceiling of a high-performing district with no obvious next step
- Turned to books and podcasts but found passive consumption wasn't translating to change
- Joining a structured cohort provided timelines and accountability that self-directed learning lacked
- A role restructuring arrived simultaneously — forcing reinvention rather than allowing drift
What a strengths assessment revealed
- Highlighted a natural ability to anticipate problems six to eight months ahead — something he had always dismissed as obvious
- Surfaced stress as a hidden daily constant, not a situational reaction
- Led directly to two new habits: morning gratitude and intention-setting; regular deep reflective thinking
- Key insight: natural strengths often feel unremarkable to the person who has them
Shifting from directing to coaching
- Adopted the seven questions from The Coaching Habit (Michael Bungay Stanier) as a core practice
- Wrote the questions down and reviewed them before each store visit
- First month: consistently reverted to directing after one or two questions; reflection afterwards made the pattern visible
- The discipline of pre-planning questions prevented him from defaulting to solutions during conversations
- Teams generate their own answers → higher buy-in, more durable change
- Marker of progress: catching himself mid-direction and pivoting to a question instead
Accountability and underperformance
- Insight from Bungay Stanier: letting a poor fit linger harms both the individual and the team
- Changed approach: name the expectation clearly, follow up, then name the consequence explicitly
- Not holding someone accountable reads as kindness but denies them the information they need to improve or exit
- Coaching questions surface the problem; a direct closing statement sets the line
Leading through industry disruption
- Pharmacy reimbursement shifting from fee-for-service to fee-for-value; Amazon entering the market
- Initial instinct: resist the pace of staff reductions as too fast
- Leading Change (John Kotter) reframed this: incremental change tends to die; abrupt change is often necessary
- Changed his message to stores: explained the why, named the stakes, asked for buy-in rather than compliance
- Repeated the new mission — connecting health, nutrition, and wellness at a personal level — until it embedded
- District achieved its best-ever metric scores during the transition
Lessons from a new team member
- A newly created operations technician role brought a consistently positive presence into store visits
- Her practice: open with what the pharmacy is doing well before naming areas for improvement
- He began incorporating this — leading with positives shifts the reception of critical feedback
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.