The original is one click away. Open original ↗
A quarterly planning system that beats annual goals
Executive overview
Annual goals lose relevance by mid-year and fail to motivate action on distant targets. Planning in 12-week cycles forces earlier prioritisation and keeps goals actionable throughout.
The system pairs each objective (a lagging indicator) with a leading indicator — a single recurring action that reliably drives the outcome. Planning quarterly also means unexpected events rarely derail an entire plan.
The core insight: choosing what not to do is the strategy.
Why annual planning falls short
- Goals set in January often become irrelevant by March or April as context shifts
- Objectives due in September are easy to ignore for months — too distant to motivate
- A full year gives too much room to defer, forget, or rationalise missed targets
- Purchasing an external course (e.g. Best Year Ever) can create accountability, but the structure still breaks down mid-year
How the 12-week year works
- Treat each quarter as a self-contained "year": 12 weeks of execution, week 13 for planning the next cycle
- Identify the key areas of life and work (e.g. health, finances, family, professional projects)
- Set one objective per area per quarter — skip an area if nothing meaningful applies that cycle
- Pair each objective with a leading indicator: the specific repeatable action that drives progress
- Map objectives and leading indicators across the 12 weeks on a real calendar
Leading vs lagging indicators
- Lagging indicator: the outcome you want (e.g. weigh 170 lbs) — you can't change it in the moment
- Leading indicator: the action that reliably produces the outcome (e.g. logging every meal in a tracking app)
- The art is choosing the right leading indicator for you — the same goal can have different drivers for different people
- For a website redesign: the leading indicators were writing a vision document and hiring a designer — everything else followed
Handling the frustration of too many goals
- Around weeks 11–12 of planning, you will consistently run out of calendar space before you run out of goals
- This is intentional friction: it forces the tradeoff that annual planning avoids
- Tag deferred items for next quarter rather than deleting them — they stay visible without occupying mental space
- Crossing items off the plan is better than carrying constant weekly frustration about unfinished work
Staying on track during the quarter
- Leave buffer weeks at the end of each quarter for tasks that overran or were disrupted
- When something slips, move it to a later week in the quarter before pushing to next quarter
- Keep a "next quarter" list synced across devices — capture new ideas immediately without carrying them mentally
- Adjust the weekly plan tactically during each weekly review; don't try to schedule every hour 12 weeks out
- 12 weeks is short enough that a single unexpected event rarely derails the whole plan
Better in-the-moment decisions
- Having done the critical thinking upfront makes it easier to say no to requests and opportunities during the quarter
- You can evaluate new inputs against a concrete plan rather than abstract priorities
- Eisenhower: "Plans are worthless, but planning is everything" — the value is in the thinking, not the document
Three starting points
- Never planned formally → start with annual planning (e.g. Best Year Ever course) before attempting quarterly
- Have annual goals but struggle to execute → read The 12 Week Year by Brian Moran and Michael Lennington
- Ready to try quarterly planning → start now, even mid-quarter; a partial quarter is enough to test the system
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.