The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How to build a startup brand that stands out and converts
Executive overview
Most early-stage websites try to look mature before the product is ready. This sets wrong expectations and attracts the wrong users.
The right approach: be specific, be honest about your stage, and speak directly to the narrow group you actually want. Your homepage is a filter, not a brochure.
The brand should evolve with the company — start with specificity, not polish.
Start simple and stage-appropriate
- Linear's first site was built in a couple of days, not weeks.
- Copy said "issue tracking" — not "work platform" — to attract engineers who knew exactly what they needed.
- Vague headlines like "where work happens" appeal to investors, not early users.
- A slightly obscured product screenshot builds curiosity without explaining everything.
- One page, no blog, no about page — just enough to capture email signups.
- Trying to look like a mature company too early sets expectations the product can't meet.
The homepage is a filter
- Write copy that repels people who are not your target — that's a feature, not a bug.
- The two-sentence pitch for users is different from the one for investors: use jargon your users know, not grand vision language.
- Homepage = front page: give enough to decide if it's interesting, not enough to overwhelm.
- Push feature depth to inner pages; keep the top simple and pointed.
- Your first headline should name the specific thing you do, not a category you aspire to.
Find your early adopter and speak to them
- Identify the one thing your ideal early customer cares most about, then optimise everything for that.
- For Linear, speed was the signal — it filtered for startups who hated slow tools.
- Startups care about speed; enterprises care about process — you can serve both, but not at launch.
- Talk to users: ask why they chose the product, then put those exact words on the page.
- Don't guess the language — match what the customer types into Google.
Brand evolves with the company
- Linear's first site was purple and minimal; the current site is black-and-white and more detailed.
- New headline names three specific capabilities (issues, projects, roadmaps) because the product now does more.
- Even as the product grows, resist the urge to list every feature on the homepage.
- Tone and visual maturity should reflect the current customer base, not the aspirational one.
Live site reviews — common patterns
Sprites AI
- Headline ("build custom AI workflows and streamline growth") doesn't say who it's for.
- Looping animation on the first screen draws attention away from the core message.
- Floating prompt UI looks like a cookie banner — users ignore it.
- Template categories are useful but buried; grouping by user type would be clearer.
- Show one worked example of a workflow — don't just show the template grid.
GigaML
- Enterprise buyers don't click "book a demo" from a website — outbound and events matter more.
- The voice demo is a good idea, but it opens with "what do you want to talk about?" — guide users to the high-value prompts instead.
- "Trusted by some of the most admired companies in the world" is a missed headline — use the space to say what the product does.
- "Voice AI" only appears mid-page; it should be in the headline since that's the differentiator.
- Enterprise audiences need depth: security pages, case studies, specific use-case pages — link to them rather than cramming them into the homepage.
Unreal Milk
- Horizontal scroll, hand-drawn illustrations, and playful copy create a genuinely memorable brand.
- The organic aesthetic deliberately counters anxiety about lab-grown food — smart positioning.
- No call to action anywhere: add an email signup to capture interested visitors.
- The bottle design is minimal and monochrome; the website is colourful — a missed opportunity to align them.
- Font choice reinforces the handcrafted feel; use opinionated display fonts for headlines, readable fonts for body text.
Confident AI
- "Built by the creators of DeepEval" is meaningless unless you explain what DeepEval is (open-source Python library).
- Target early adopters are existing DeepEval users — the site could just say that explicitly.
- Skimming only headlines is a useful test: "make forward progress" is vague; the others are specific enough.
- Purple underlined text reads as a broken link — avoid that styling for non-link text.
- Rather than listing features, show how the product differs from alternatives: pick a lane and own it.
Dropback
- Targeting non-technical users (football coaches) means trust signals matter more than feature density.
- Moving background grid adds chaos without meaning — removing it loses nothing.
- Heavy automatic animation on every section compounds the chaotic feel; use animation to direct attention, not fill space.
- Yellow is a hard brand colour: works as an accent, too low-contrast as a button or background.
- Long single-page scroll works, but navigation items could link to dedicated audience pages (e.g. "for coaches", "for programs") rather than anchor links down the same page.
Visual and typography principles
- Animation should guide attention toward key actions — looping decorative movement competes with the message.
- Typography: pair a distinctive display font for headlines with a legible standard font for body.
- Contrast: yellow and light colours need dark text; white-on-yellow is unreadable.
- Colour as trust signal: at Coinbase, the design goal was "looks trustworthy" — the same applies to any product where credibility is the barrier.
- Screenshots: slightly faded or cropped product images build curiosity without requiring the user to understand the full UI.
- Social proof: customer logos and quotes work better when the audience is non-technical; GitHub stars work better for developers.
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.