The original is one click away. Open original ↗
What bad investor meetings teach founders about raising money
Executive overview
Fundraising is a game with unwritten rules, and investors hold most of the early leverage. YC partners share their worst investor meetings — as founders and as partners — to set realistic expectations before you enter the room.
The common thread: investor behavior reveals fit, not founder worth. The goal is to raise from people who are respectful, decisive, and wire the money fast — then stay out of your way.
Bad investor behavior is information, not a test you need to pass.
Investor power plays and red flags
- One London investor made founders wait hours as a deliberate status signal — kept shoes off, picked his feet, smoked indoors, poured coffee over his lunch mid-meeting
- A famous Valley VC spent the first five minutes of a pitch asking the Chinese-American co-founder to translate phrases — the company was never discussed seriously
- Another investor slowly opened a candy wrapper during a pitch, pausing whenever the founder stopped talking — a deliberate distraction test
- A VC asked two co-founders whether they were dating before asking about the business
- The worst meetings leave founders questioning why they're building — not just whether they'll get the money
What investor behavior actually signals
- Investor process is their product — how they treat you in the meeting is how they'll treat you as a board member
- If an investor opens with something unrelated to your business, they probably aren't interested in your business
- Status games and disrespect are not unique incidents — they're habitual
- The financial world still runs partly on ego and hierarchy; the best builder-focused VCs are a different category
Grading investors
- A minus: makes a decision quickly, signs docs, wires money, leaves you alone — this is sufficient
- A: does something concrete to help the business
- A plus: materially changes the direction of the company
- Avoid C, D, F investors — they create busywork, argue constantly, and are a net negative
- Bad money is worse than no money; a damaging investor is infinitely worse than a merely mediocre one
The co-founder CEO mistake
- Posterous had strong metrics and a final partner meeting at Andreessen Horowitz — the deal fell apart when asked "who is the CEO?" and both founders said "both of us"
- Ben Horowitz had written publicly and at length about the necessity of a single CEO
- Research your investors — know their pet peeves, read what they've written
- By Series A, the lead investor needs to know who they're actually working with
Founder mistakes that hurt fundraising
- Sending an email titled "Cash Crunch" to existing investors signals desperation, not opportunity
- Flying across the country to a meeting without confirming decision-makers would attend
- Treating a vague "next time you're in town" as a committed invitation
- Letting investors sleep in your apartment hallway and discovering them asleep on air mattresses — professionalism is expected on both sides
- Pitching without a clear narrative around how the ask fits the company's broader strategy
How to manage the fundraising process
- Believe the no; don't believe the stated reason — investors rarely give honest explanations for passing
- An A-grade investor responds to questions, makes decisions quickly, and respects your time
- Prepare for more meetings than you want, more nos than you expect, and value-add promises that rarely materialize
- Don't optimize for finding the perfect investor — optimize for finding one who is respectful and moves fast
- YC's investor database lets founders see peer feedback on investors before taking meetings; use it to prioritize
Avoiding the investor-feedback trap
- Too many founders use investor enthusiasm as the barometer for whether their startup is good — this is the wrong signal
- Adjusting your pitch based on investor feedback is smart; adjusting your product based on it is dangerous
- Companies that over-index on investor feedback end up with a Frankenstein product — fundable but unsellable
- During hype cycles, founders triangulate what investors want to hear, raise money, then wake up with no actual business
- Sophisticated founders separate the pitch game from the actual strategy
Keeping the right perspective
- Fundraising is a tool, not a milestone worth celebrating — the money enables the work, it isn't the work
- Investor traction is not evidence your startup is good; neither is investor rejection evidence it's bad
- Demo Day gives founders rare leverage — a list of inbound interest — use it to select investors rather than just accept them
- The goal is to spend as little time as possible fundraising and as much time as possible talking to users and building
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.