What bad investor meetings teach founders about raising money

Executive overview

Fundraising is a game with unwritten rules, and investors hold most of the early leverage. YC partners share their worst investor meetings — as founders and as partners — to set realistic expectations before you enter the room.

The common thread: investor behavior reveals fit, not founder worth. The goal is to raise from people who are respectful, decisive, and wire the money fast — then stay out of your way.

Bad investor behavior is information, not a test you need to pass.

Investor power plays and red flags

  • One London investor made founders wait hours as a deliberate status signal — kept shoes off, picked his feet, smoked indoors, poured coffee over his lunch mid-meeting
  • A famous Valley VC spent the first five minutes of a pitch asking the Chinese-American co-founder to translate phrases — the company was never discussed seriously
  • Another investor slowly opened a candy wrapper during a pitch, pausing whenever the founder stopped talking — a deliberate distraction test
  • A VC asked two co-founders whether they were dating before asking about the business
  • The worst meetings leave founders questioning why they're building — not just whether they'll get the money

What investor behavior actually signals

  • Investor process is their product — how they treat you in the meeting is how they'll treat you as a board member
  • If an investor opens with something unrelated to your business, they probably aren't interested in your business
  • Status games and disrespect are not unique incidents — they're habitual
  • The financial world still runs partly on ego and hierarchy; the best builder-focused VCs are a different category

Grading investors

  • A minus: makes a decision quickly, signs docs, wires money, leaves you alone — this is sufficient
  • A: does something concrete to help the business
  • A plus: materially changes the direction of the company
  • Avoid C, D, F investors — they create busywork, argue constantly, and are a net negative
  • Bad money is worse than no money; a damaging investor is infinitely worse than a merely mediocre one

The co-founder CEO mistake

  • Posterous had strong metrics and a final partner meeting at Andreessen Horowitz — the deal fell apart when asked "who is the CEO?" and both founders said "both of us"
  • Ben Horowitz had written publicly and at length about the necessity of a single CEO
  • Research your investors — know their pet peeves, read what they've written
  • By Series A, the lead investor needs to know who they're actually working with

Founder mistakes that hurt fundraising

  • Sending an email titled "Cash Crunch" to existing investors signals desperation, not opportunity
  • Flying across the country to a meeting without confirming decision-makers would attend
  • Treating a vague "next time you're in town" as a committed invitation
  • Letting investors sleep in your apartment hallway and discovering them asleep on air mattresses — professionalism is expected on both sides
  • Pitching without a clear narrative around how the ask fits the company's broader strategy

How to manage the fundraising process

  • Believe the no; don't believe the stated reason — investors rarely give honest explanations for passing
  • An A-grade investor responds to questions, makes decisions quickly, and respects your time
  • Prepare for more meetings than you want, more nos than you expect, and value-add promises that rarely materialize
  • Don't optimize for finding the perfect investor — optimize for finding one who is respectful and moves fast
  • YC's investor database lets founders see peer feedback on investors before taking meetings; use it to prioritize

Avoiding the investor-feedback trap

  • Too many founders use investor enthusiasm as the barometer for whether their startup is good — this is the wrong signal
  • Adjusting your pitch based on investor feedback is smart; adjusting your product based on it is dangerous
  • Companies that over-index on investor feedback end up with a Frankenstein product — fundable but unsellable
  • During hype cycles, founders triangulate what investors want to hear, raise money, then wake up with no actual business
  • Sophisticated founders separate the pitch game from the actual strategy

Keeping the right perspective

  • Fundraising is a tool, not a milestone worth celebrating — the money enables the work, it isn't the work
  • Investor traction is not evidence your startup is good; neither is investor rejection evidence it's bad
  • Demo Day gives founders rare leverage — a list of inbound interest — use it to select investors rather than just accept them
  • The goal is to spend as little time as possible fundraising and as much time as possible talking to users and building

More like this — when you're ready for early access.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Get early access to the full library.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.