The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How a rubber belt distributor cut owner hours and 4x'd gross profit
Executive overview
A founder-led distribution business had the owner as the single bottleneck — every decision came back to him, including weekend admin. The fix was structural, not motivational.
Coach Geoff Gwynn applied three tools in sequence: talent assessment to identify who could step up, a functional accountability chart to assign clear ownership, and a process accountability chart to fix cross-functional breakdowns. Within one year, sales rose 30% and gross profit grew 4x.
When the owner stops being the bottleneck, growth accelerates without requiring more of their time.
Building the management team with talent assessment
- The talent assessment tool maps people on two axes: fit to company values and performance in role.
- A players: high fit, high performance. B players: high fit, underperforming — coaching or role change needed. C players: low on one or both axes.
- One underutilised employee with strong values fit was developed into the operations lead.
- A long-tenured but declining employee had responsibilities reduced; she became more engaged.
- The bookkeeper — low performance, low fit — left; replaced by a management accountant and a trainee.
- Better financial reporting meant Dan could end the weekend catch-up sessions.
Clarifying ownership with the functional accountability chart
- The functional accountability chart (FACE) identifies which key functions every business needs — irrespective of job titles — and who owns each.
- Common failure mode: no clear accountability, so tasks fall between people or get duplicated.
- For this business, three functions were prioritised in year one: sales and marketing, operations, and finance.
- Operations gap was the most critical — no one owned inventory control or dispatch performance.
- Each function was given defined outputs, then KPIs were built from those outputs.
Getting KPIs right through iteration
- Initial operations KPI: 100% same-day dispatch. Customer complaints rose — the logistics provider was shipping incomplete orders.
- One word changed the metric: "100% complete same-day shipments." Behavior shifted immediately.
- Completeness rates reached 98–99% after the change.
- KPIs require refinement; the first version is rarely the right version.
- Systems sometimes can't produce the stat you need — going manual (clipboard in the shipping area) is a valid interim fix.
Fixing cross-functional processes with PACE
- The process accountability chart (PACE) maps key processes that span multiple functions — quoting to cash collection, purchasing to dispatch.
- For this business, the critical process was stock control: the North American manufacturer was shipping incomplete against orders, creating wrong-stock and short-stock situations.
- A stock control process was built, owned through finance, monitoring high-turnover items and 30-day stock outlook.
- Tightening inventory reduced duplicate shipping costs, which directly expanded gross margin.
- The data gathered also supported a negotiation with the manufacturer for extended payment terms on ~$1M of additional stock.
Year two outlook
- Organic growth target: 50% year-on-year.
- Strategic acquisition in scope — a complementary product line sold into the existing customer base.
- Combined organic plus acquisition path could double the business within 12 months.
- The foundation is the same: right people in clear roles, with processes and metrics that surface problems early.
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.