The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Ho Nam of Altos Ventures: Berkshire-Style Investing in Early-Stage Tech
Executive overview
Most VCs optimise for markups and quick exits. Altos Ventures optimises for ownership — holding winners for decades and adding capital at each stage rather than cashing out. The model is built on three pillars: back hedgehog founders with a single life mission, insist on capital efficiency, and never run out of money or time.
The core insight: early-stage venture is a discovery mechanism; the real returns come from showing up for the next 20 years, not from flipping to the next investor.
The Roblox story: from $1.5M to largest IPO shareholder
- First check was $1.5M in early 2008 — founders thought $2M was too much
- Entry thesis: 7% weekly compounded growth in engagement for 52 straight weeks; 200+ user-uploaded YouTube videos proved organic passion
- Altos bought secondary shares on six separate occasions as conviction grew
- Registered as an RIA specifically to run SPVs — unlocked $125M+ rounds at $2.5B and $4B valuations
- Sold 15% at ~$500M valuation to satisfy LPs; later concluded it was a $1B+ mistake
- Held through the pulled IPO; bought more at $45/share ($30B cap); became largest shareholder at listing
The Wuwa Brothers lesson: becoming an RIA
- Wuwa Brothers (Korean food-delivery, now ~$8B GMV) was the test bed for every structural experiment
- Cross-fund investing — investing fund after fund into the same company — was controversial with LPs but fundamental to the Altos model
- A handshake secondary deal fell apart over price; the resulting delay meant Altos was still holding when Naver came in at a higher valuation
- That near-miss forced the RIA registration decision; the $30M secondary SPV for Wuwa made it necessary and proved it worthwhile
How Altos thinks about founders
- Seeks hedgehog founders — one life mission, not serial entrepreneurs chasing the next deal
- Sam Walton didn't start Walmart until 46; Buffett could have retired at 25 — persistence without financial need is the signal
- Foxes are competent and fundable; hedgehogs are boring, bad at networking, and great at building enduring companies
- "Company-founder fit" matters more than market size — the match between a person's life mission and the company they're building
Capital efficiency as founder protection
- The number-one rule: founders must control their own destiny
- Every time a founder runs out of money, an investor gains control — and the founder's mission is at risk
- Altos will step on the gas (Coupang needed $3B from SoftBank; Toss burned money on every transaction early) but only when the business model justifies it
- Creativity loves constraints — limiting burn forces product and business-model innovation
- Price-per-share appreciation matters more than headline valuation; dilution can hide deteriorating fundamentals
The three tests for a truly special business
- Does the business make money, or is there a clear path to cashflow breakeven?
- Does it have a moat — network effects, proprietary know-how, or counter-positioning a competitor can see but cannot replicate?
- Does Altos have a deep relationship with the company — people known across multiple layers, multiple years?
On holding winners and missing sells
- Venture is the world's greatest discovery mechanism; once you discover an opportunity, you have 10–20 years to build it
- "Passing" on a deal is a mental construct — you can always invest later (Geico: Buffett bought, sold, bought, sold, bought again over 70 years)
- The pain of selling Roblox at $500M (a $1B+ mistake) and nearly selling Wuwa at the wrong price drove a permanent shift in conviction
- Sell when you need the money or when your proprietary knowledge of the business has decayed — not because of external pressure
On the fund management business vs. the investment decision
- DPI pressure — distributing cash to LPs to help raise the next fund — creates real conflict with optimal investment decisions
- Most VCs make decisions that serve the management company or the fund, not the underlying investment thesis
- Altos runs all SPVs at zero management fees; carry only after a hurdle; the Buffett Partnership structure is available to everyone and almost no one copies it
- Cross-fund investing, once an LP concession born of poor reserving, became a core strategic tool once Altos had the conviction and the RIA structure to support it
Investing philosophy applied to public markets
- Every Altos partner manages their own 401K — decades of practice before serious capital is at stake
- Get to know a concentrated list of businesses deeply; when a crisis misprices one you know, act
- Individual investors have structural advantages over institutions: no career risk, no redemptions, unlimited concentration and time horizon
- The "leave it alone" strategy consistently outperforms active trading for long-hold positions
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.