Original source details coming soon.
Stoicism, Buddhism, and embracing impermanence with Young Pueblo
Executive overview
Most people treat change as a threat — something to resist or survive. But both Stoic and Buddhist thought converge on a deeper insight: everything you have, including life itself, arrived through change. Resisting impermanence doesn't protect you; it just generates suffering.
Ryan Holiday and poet Diego Perez (Young Pueblo) explore where Stoicism and Buddhism overlap — on impermanence, emotional maturity, detachment from outcomes, and the trap of clinging to opinions.
Change is not the enemy of what you love — it is the source of it.
Where Stoicism and Buddhism converge
- Both traditions identify attachment to opinions and expectations as the root of most suffering
- Core insights — unconditional love, goodwill, making meaning from suffering — are rediscovered independently across cultures and eras
- "Awakening the individual" and "stabilising the community" move in sync across Buddhist, Stoic, and other traditions
- Tradition is often a solution to a forgotten problem; remove it without understanding why it exists at your peril
Emotional maturity and the gap between feeling and action
- Emotional maturity is not transcending emotion — it is sitting with the rawness of a feeling without letting it take over
- Stoicism and Buddhism both introduce the gray area: you can feel an emotion fully without acting on it
- When facing injustice, a mind clouded by anger loses strategic clarity and risks reproducing the same brutality
- Compassion for wrongdoers is not excusing them — it is recognising that people causing harm are living inside profound internal suffering
- "They're not getting away with anything" — someone winning the external contest while unable to access peace or satisfaction is still losing
Impermanence as a framework, not a consolation
- Marcus Aurelius: everything you have — including your existence — came from change; fearing death is fearing the same process that gave you life
- The mistake is believing you can choose when change stops — that you can "take your cards off the table" and keep your winnings
- What cannot be taken away: the fact that you had something, that a moment happened, that you did the work
- Young Pueblo: the universe is not just one of change but of motion — nothing is static; that dynamism is what produces life
- Gratitude toward change is as valid as fear of it — every person you love exists because of change
The power of having no opinion
- Marcus Aurelius: we always have the power to choose to have no opinion
- Endless opinion-having is both a source of harm to others and a source of personal unhappiness
- Understanding the ceaselessness of change helps — many things you feel urgently opinionated about will resolve or disappear on their own
- A practical alternative to debate: "tell me more" — hearing where someone is coming from before deciding whether the disagreement even matters
- The Buddha's final warning to his community: attachment to views has the power to divide even the enlightened
Success, enoughness, and the trap of external validation
- Joseph Heller's response to Vonnegut at a billionaire's party: "I have something he will never have — enough"
- Very few wealthy or powerful people actually feel sufficient; they measure themselves against someone else, just like everyone else
- Fame and success are a poison best taken in small doses over time, not all at once — sudden large-scale success is destabilising
- The people wealthiest people call when they divorce are the ones with internal peace, not external status
- Doing work that others would dream of doing is the lottery — remembering that reframes the daily grind
On not identifying with your output
- There is a difference between articulating an idea beautifully and having fully integrated it into your life
- Don't credit the person with the thing they are a conduit for — artists and philosophers are actively learning too
- The tortured artist myth is as misleading as the myth that great books "just happen" — methodical, gradual, painstaking work underlies almost everything impressive
- Atomic Habits didn't come out of nowhere: years of email list building, 200 podcasts, deliberate launch execution
- Long-term relational stability frees up mental bandwidth that would otherwise be consumed by seeking
Living in turbulent times — the Stoic precedent
- Cato lived through the fall of the Roman Republic and Julius Caesar's overthrow of it — he didn't disengage, he stayed philosophically involved
- Socrates lived not in a golden age but during the time of the Thirty Tyrants and the Peloponnesian War
- The Buddha, Confucius, and the Vipassana teachers who revived that tradition all operated amid corruption, war, and upheaval
- Wisdom that emerges amid chaos is not incidental — the chaos is often what makes the wisdom necessary and testable
- Political fear and outrage often consume energy that could address actual injustices; preserving that energy is itself a strategic act
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.