The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Internal vs external COO: how to decide which is right
Executive overview
Promoting the wrong person to COO — even a top performer — wastes their talent and damages the organisation. The decision between internal and external candidates should be driven by a scorecard, not loyalty or convenience.
Write the roles, responsibilities, and success metrics first. Then evaluate every candidate against that same standard.
The scorecard comes before the candidate — not the other way around.
What the COO role actually requires
- COO success is almost entirely about leading and managing people, not domain expertise
- Skills that matter: building consensus, managing conflict, growing teams, project and time management
- Unlike functional heads, a COO doesn't need to be the best in any one discipline
When to favour an internal candidate
- Deep industry or technical domain knowledge is genuinely required for the role
- Promotes someone already embedded in culture, relationships, and operations
- Avoids the political friction of hiring over existing team members
- Avoids the ramp-up cost of learning the industry, org, and people from scratch
When to favour an external candidate
- No internal candidate clears the scorecard threshold — don't promote to keep someone
- Fresh perspective is more valuable than institutional knowledge in that context
- Poaching from a competitor is sometimes the only way to get the required industry experience
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.