The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Why Neil Patel avoids real estate and bets on tech
Executive overview
Most people treat their primary home as an investment. It isn't — you can't realise the gains while living in it, and the capital is illiquid. S&P returns compound freely; home equity doesn't.
Neil Patel built a family office from recurring business cash flow and decades of angel investing, not a single liquidity event. His investment philosophy mirrors his career: back what you know, back people you trust, and let the numbers game work over time.
Expertise and relationship-based conviction beat formal due diligence when you have long track records to rely on.
From websites at 16 to a family office at 37
- Started building websites at 16, cold-calling advertisers to offer free traffic in exchange for payment on results.
- Built a digital marketing agency that reached several million in revenue before collapsing in 2008.
- Pivoted to Crazy Egg (analytics software) during the crash — it kept growing while the agency declined.
- NP Digital (agency relaunch) now has ~750 employees; software and services businesses generate millions per month in free cash flow.
- No single liquidity event — wealth accumulated through recycled cash flow and compounding angel returns over 16+ years.
Why he dislikes real estate as an asset class
- Primary homes are not investments: gains are unrealised while you live there.
- Renting and deploying the capital elsewhere (e.g. S&P at ~9% compounded) leaves gains accessible and liquid.
- Real estate is illiquid, management-intensive, and returns lag tech and angel investing significantly.
- A $8.6M business acquisition was conservatively worth $20M after integration — that kind of return is structurally impossible in real estate.
- He holds $20–30M in real estate equity but considers it a lifestyle cost, not a portfolio allocation.
- Real estate rarely goes to zero, but it rarely produces power-law outcomes either.
How he structures angel investing
- Started with $25K checks, scaled to $50K then $100K, and gradually consolidated into fewer, larger positions.
- Tracks investments via a simple spreadsheet (entry, exit, gain/loss); outsources bookkeeping as volume grows.
- Prefers becoming an LP in a fund to writing dozens of individual checks — one K-1, not 20.
- Backs the same trusted operators repeatedly rather than evaluating each deal from scratch.
- Primary diligence signal: how much is the lead investor putting in relative to their net worth? Skin in the game as a percentage matters.
- Co-invested alongside Andy Lu (~10 deals); his angel fund reportedly returned ~40% per year in cash (not paper) returns.
Investment philosophy: invest in what you know
- Concentrates in tech because he understands it, has deal flow, and can assess quality quickly.
- Tech has power-law distribution: strikeouts are expected; the winners more than compensate.
- Friends with older (50+) entrepreneurs who share deal flow — minimal diligence needed when relationship and track record are established.
- Will invest based on a five-minute conversation or a short email if the person has a proven record and meaningful skin in the game.
- Avoids becoming the sole or dominant LP in a fund — wants the manager to have diversified capital.
Professionalising the family office
- First step was hiring a bookkeeper to track investments systematically.
- Consolidation followed: fewer checks, larger positions, LP structures to reduce administrative overhead.
- Tax complexity scales fast — currently files 50–60 K-1s plus 100+ supporting documents annually.
- Still spends the majority of time as an operator, not an investor; the investment side runs in parallel.
- Family office philosophy reflects founder identity: high-conviction bets in sectors where expertise creates edge.
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.