The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Cheap vs. expensive freelance writers: does price predict quality?
Executive overview
Higher rates do not guarantee better content. Three writers at 2, 15, and 40 cents per word produced the same article — and the panel's favourite differed for each reviewer.
Quality judgement depends on the evaluator's context. A low-tolerance editor values concision; an affiliate site owner values readability and usefulness.
Price is a poor proxy for quality — evaluate writers by their work, not their rate.
How the test was set up
- Three writers hired via ProBlogger Jobs from 435 applicants; selected solely by rate
- All given an identical brief: write a "best purple laser pointers" post, 500–1,300 words
- Articles blind-scored on clarity, depth, and usefulness (0–10 scale)
- Three reviewers: a blog editor (Josh), a technical SEO (Patrick), the experiment organiser (Sam)
2 cents per word writer ($31.92, 1,596 words)
- Submitted in one day; exceeded the word limit by 296 words
- Josh's favourite: scannable structure, answers easy to find under each subheading
- Patrick: most in-depth content, including a useful pets safety warning others missed
- Significant grammar and fluency errors; likely non-native English speaker
- Sam: hard pass — poor flow, bullet-list sentences stitched together
- Verdict: rehire only with a separate editor
15 cents per word writer ($142.80, 952 words)
- Submitted in four days; word count within range
- Sam's favourite: clean read, useful safety detail (FDA reference), good value
- Josh's least favourite: fluffy intro, repeated generic context instead of useful specifics
- Patrick: neutral — pulled in review data, but wordy and repetitive in places
- Verdict: strong value pick for a typical affiliate site; Josh would not rehire
40 cents per word writer ($334.80, 837 words)
- Submitted in six days; shortest article of the three
- Patrick's favourite: cleanest writing, minimal errors
- Josh: lacked depth; key points buried in obvious or unhelpful filler
- Sam: best technical writer, but the 15-cent writer offered better value
- Verdict: potentially worth it for high-margin or brand-sensitive markets; not justified for low-revenue affiliate content
Key takeaways and hiring advice
- Score writers against explicit criteria (clarity, depth, usefulness) so judgements stay consistent
- Don't let rate shape your quality expectations — evaluate the work directly
- Actively recruit from blogs you already respect: use a tool like Ahrefs Content Explorer to find prolific authors, then contact them directly
- Higher-paid writers tend to write shorter articles — less padding, but not necessarily more depth
- Any of the three articles was likely good enough to rank on a typical affiliate site
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.