Cheap vs. expensive freelance writers: does price predict quality?

Executive overview

Higher rates do not guarantee better content. Three writers at 2, 15, and 40 cents per word produced the same article — and the panel's favourite differed for each reviewer.

Quality judgement depends on the evaluator's context. A low-tolerance editor values concision; an affiliate site owner values readability and usefulness.

Price is a poor proxy for quality — evaluate writers by their work, not their rate.

How the test was set up

  • Three writers hired via ProBlogger Jobs from 435 applicants; selected solely by rate
  • All given an identical brief: write a "best purple laser pointers" post, 500–1,300 words
  • Articles blind-scored on clarity, depth, and usefulness (0–10 scale)
  • Three reviewers: a blog editor (Josh), a technical SEO (Patrick), the experiment organiser (Sam)

2 cents per word writer ($31.92, 1,596 words)

  • Submitted in one day; exceeded the word limit by 296 words
  • Josh's favourite: scannable structure, answers easy to find under each subheading
  • Patrick: most in-depth content, including a useful pets safety warning others missed
  • Significant grammar and fluency errors; likely non-native English speaker
  • Sam: hard pass — poor flow, bullet-list sentences stitched together
  • Verdict: rehire only with a separate editor

15 cents per word writer ($142.80, 952 words)

  • Submitted in four days; word count within range
  • Sam's favourite: clean read, useful safety detail (FDA reference), good value
  • Josh's least favourite: fluffy intro, repeated generic context instead of useful specifics
  • Patrick: neutral — pulled in review data, but wordy and repetitive in places
  • Verdict: strong value pick for a typical affiliate site; Josh would not rehire

40 cents per word writer ($334.80, 837 words)

  • Submitted in six days; shortest article of the three
  • Patrick's favourite: cleanest writing, minimal errors
  • Josh: lacked depth; key points buried in obvious or unhelpful filler
  • Sam: best technical writer, but the 15-cent writer offered better value
  • Verdict: potentially worth it for high-margin or brand-sensitive markets; not justified for low-revenue affiliate content

Key takeaways and hiring advice

  • Score writers against explicit criteria (clarity, depth, usefulness) so judgements stay consistent
  • Don't let rate shape your quality expectations — evaluate the work directly
  • Actively recruit from blogs you already respect: use a tool like Ahrefs Content Explorer to find prolific authors, then contact them directly
  • Higher-paid writers tend to write shorter articles — less padding, but not necessarily more depth
  • Any of the three articles was likely good enough to rank on a typical affiliate site

More like this — when you're ready for early access.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Get early access to the full library.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.