The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Tying pay to tasks and titles, not inflated job labels
Executive overview
Title creep — where employees hold inflated titles — causes pay expectations to outpace the actual work required. The fix is to anchor compensation to tasks and projects first, then assign an appropriate title, then benchmark pay to that role.
Match the title to the work, then price the work — not the title.
Setting compensation correctly
- List every task and project on the person's scorecard before discussing pay
- Assign a title that reflects that workload, not seniority aspirations
- C-level titles once required major-org seniority — most roles today don't qualify
- Benchmark pay against industry norms for the correctly scoped title
Using tiered levels within a role
- Create three sub-levels per role (e.g. Director of Sales 1, 2, 3) before promoting to VP
- Tiered levels give clear progression without inflating titles prematurely
- Compensation is tied to level attained, not the label the employee wants
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.