The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Authenticity is not an excuse to avoid calibrating your behaviour
Executive overview
Leaders often invoke authenticity to justify behaviours that undermine their teams. Authenticity is neither singular nor static — it shifts across roles and evolves over time.
Integrity, not authenticity, is the real standard: it demands pausing primal instincts and aligning actions with present-day intentions.
The book introduces practical tools — integrity denominators, the experimental mindset, and micro-habits — to help leaders close the gap between who they are and how they show up.
The "yeah, but" trap
- "Yeah, but" blocks generative conversation and shuts down team input.
- Internally, it closes off alternative explanations for your own behaviour.
- The harder the pushback, the closer the feedback likely is to a real truth.
- Becoming a manager is often the moment you stop hearing the full truth.
- A "yeah, but" keeps the gates of truth permanently closed.
Why "this is just how I am" fails
- Authenticity is not singular — you show up differently as a parent, colleague, and leader, and all versions are genuine.
- Authenticity is not static — growth means you are no longer the five-year-old having a tantrum.
- Pressure, not power, corrupts: the demands of each role shape behaviour in ways that can distort original intentions.
- Values are not absolute; they trade off against each other depending on context and goal.
- Hiding behind "that's just me" is often a way of avoiding fear, not honouring identity.
The cost of uncalibrated behaviour
- Janet, a high-performing CEO, dismissed her "no, no, no" response style as just how she was.
- Her team spent three times as long outside meetings decoding what she meant or venting frustration.
- Employees who feel badly treated by managers will deliberately underperform to retaliate.
- She repeatedly sent people to fetch the wrong "rock" because she never clarified what she actually wanted.
- Believing success came because of these traits — not despite them — is a major and common fallacy.
Integrity denominators
- Identify the non-negotiables: what stays constant across every role you play.
- Map both the consistencies and differences across roles — the consistencies ground you, the differences create flexibility.
- Underlying values inform those behaviours; surfacing them makes action more deliberate and strategic.
Shifting with an experimental mindset
- Frame change as an experiment, not a transformation — if it fails, you can revert.
- High achievers who go "all in" on change tend to fail and conclude the change was wrong; small steps prevent this.
- Micro-habit example: thank one person for one small thing, once a week — that specific, that modest.
- Tiny habits, consistently applied over time, produce large shifts without triggering identity resistance.
- Incrementalism works: running 0.1 miles more per week over three years can take you from non-runner to marathon finisher.
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.