The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How 97 Display's visionary and integrator built a durable partnership
Executive overview
Most visionaries struggle to communicate their vision clearly — even when it feels crystal clear to them. Without a trusted integrator, implementation stalls and vision stays vision.
Houston Goodwin and Kristie Kenley of 97 Display share how they built a functional visionary/integrator (V/I) partnership from scratch, the friction they hit early, and how they now operate across multiple companies.
The rarest asset isn't a great idea — it's finding someone who loves to do everything you hate.
How the partnership formed
- Houston started in sales, moved toward leadership, and initially sat in the integrator seat — a poor fit
- Kristie was already handling operational work Houston disliked; the transition was more evolution than appointment
- Both had tested out of their natural strengths before; EOS gave them language for what they'd been doing instinctively
- Reading Rocket Fuel felt like recognition, not revelation — "remembered, not learned"
- They framed the pairing as a long-term investment, not just a fix for 97 Display
Early challenges
- Kristie's hardest adjustment: holding final decision-making authority while still reporting to Houston
- Acting as one unified voice — rather than two individuals — took months to internalize
- Closest analogy: early marriage, where every decision requires syncing with another person
- Houston's "hurricanes" — walking into meetings and derailing them with new ideas — were disruptive before they had a name for it
- They hired a leadership coach for the first four to six months to act as a third-party mediator
Building alignment: same page meetings
- Full-day off-site once a month (now in their own office after taking over the co-working space they'd been using)
- Structure: two to three hours on ideas → lunch → afternoon for action items and agenda-setting
- They maintain a shared issues list in the 90.io platform before each session
- Houston uses same page time as a "safe space" to brain-dump ideas he may not even believe in by the end of the session
- Entire day is blocked even if they wrap at 2–3pm
Most revealing early signal
- On the EOS Organizational Checkup, Houston assumed vision clarity would score 10/10
- The team rated it a four
- That gap — between what the visionary assumes and what the team actually absorbs — drove their focus on translation and connecting the dots
- Kristie's role shifted: Houston paints the vision well; she maps out what each person at 3,000 feet needs to do to execute it
Handling tension and disagreement
- Both describe themselves as intense people — arguments are common, but treated as a normal part of alignment
- Most significant conflict: Houston was thinking V/I for life across multiple companies; Kristie was thinking V/I for 97 Display only
- Resolving that gap — Houston making clear how seriously he meant it — was a turning point
- "Disagree and commit" is the operating norm: disputes happen privately, the team always sees a united front
- Tiebreaker authority (integrator) is never exercised in front of the leadership team; pre-alignment happens before major issues surface publicly
Scaling to multiple companies
- After two years, they now operate as V/I across three software companies under a parent holding group
- Their pitch to the parent company for a new acquisition: "I'm a package deal — we do EOS or I don't take the role"
- Path forward: integrators for each brand, with V/I at the holding-company level
- A leadership team off-site moment crystallised buy-in — the team pushed Houston back toward long-term vision when he was getting stuck in short-term logistics
- The V/I structure is what made expansion possible; neither role is a stepping stone to the other
What makes the relationship work long-term
- Trust is foundational — without it, none of the other mechanics function
- Naming each other's tendencies defuses them: "Houston hurricane" signals a pattern without making it personal
- Actively appreciating what the other person contributes, especially in difficult moments
- Visionaries must adapt how they communicate — the burden is on the communicator, not the audience
- Neither role competes with the other; no one is gunning for the other's seat
- The analogy Houston uses: bands break up when the backup singer wants to be the lead singer
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.