The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Why artists are leaving social media — and why it might work
Executive overview
Algorithmic platforms solved internet discovery by centralising it: everything flows into a gray box, which decides what you see. For artists, this means designing for the algorithm rather than for their craft.
The alternative — the distributed trust model — routes information through human trust connections instead. It is slower, but produces higher-quality curation and is more compatible with making actual art.
The key insight: artists leaving social media are not sacrificing their careers to make a point — they are discovering a better way to be a creative online.
Why artists are revolting
- Social media constrains format: Instagram art must fit Instagram's frame
- Algorithms reward sameness and punish uniqueness — conformity is favoured over originality
- Constant platform use creates personal unhappiness and engineered addiction
- Artists find themselves chasing social validation rather than making art
- The medium corrupts the work: you end up producing content the algorithm will select, not art you believe in
The algorithmic model
- All creators feed content into a central platform; the platform's algorithms select what each user sees
- Advantages: simplicity for consumers; lottery-ticket excitement of virality for creators
- Core manipulation tactic: collectivised attention — platforms simulate a large audience (hundreds of followers) even when almost none of them see your work
- This fake-audience effect was the original hook that pulled creators away from the open web into walled gardens
- Once mobile strategy took over (~2010s), the goal shifted from "seem seen" to "keep users numbed"
The distributed trust model
- Content lives on independent websites, newsletters, podcasts — not inside a central platform
- Information spreads via individual human trust links, forming organic clusters with longer-distance connections between them
- Curation quality is higher: people only share what they genuinely find interesting
- Community standards emerge implicitly within clusters rather than needing top-down platform enforcement
- As a creator's work spreads, direct connections accumulate — a real audience of true fans, not simulated followers
Why the distributed model is harder — but better
- Growth is slow; there is no attention manipulation to inflate perceived audience size
- Consumers must do more work: following newsletters, checking websites, discovering podcasts
- Does not serve the need to be numbed on demand — no infinite scroll
- True fans (who buy work, attend events, subscribe) are more valuable than a large follower count built on algorithmic sand
- A middle-class creative living is arguably more achievable through earned true fans than through chasing viral reach
Historical parallels
- Renaissance artists depended on a handful of great patrons (e.g. the Medici); patron taste dictated the art
- Early 20th-century New York modernism — distributed galleries, peer networks — produced the abstract expressionist explosion
- Reduced centralisation correlates with greater creative innovation
Q&A highlights
- Quitting LinkedIn: apply digital minimalism — tools must earn their place; if there is no obvious value, walk away
- Reading article overload: adopt a reading ritual (regular time, specific place); aim to encounter interesting ideas, not to achieve completeness; do not carry a completist mindset
- Identifying your craft (slow productivity): use a Venn diagram of "what I can do" and "what produces clear value" — pick something in the intersection and get better at it than anyone else; uniqueness is not the goal, depth of skill is
- Daily discipline overload: routines signal what matters, but should not fill every hour; build in unstructured days; variety is essential
Case study: digital minimalism in practice
- Reader tracked 2022 vs 2023 after applying digital minimalism
- Doubled reading hours; 2.5× strength training; 3× cardio; +20–30 min sleep per night
- Screen time fell from ~4–5 hours to 1–2 hours daily
- Attention span recovered: sustained one-hour reading sessions now routine
- More present with children; saved hundreds of dollars by not replacing a still-functional phone
- Key tactic: phone foyer method — phone stays in one place at home, consulted as needed rather than carried constantly
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.