The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Strategy / Business operating systems
Leadership / Hiring & recruitment
Finance / Cash flow management
039: Growth Analysis on Two Different Companies
Executive overview
Two similar-sized companies adopted the same scaling framework at the same time. One grew by $10 million in a year; the other stalled. The difference was not the framework — it was execution discipline on three variables: people, cash, and priorities.
Commitment to making hard people decisions fast, while protecting cash and narrowing focus, separates companies that scale from those that plateau.
The three barriers to growth
- Lack of leadership — wrong people in key seats slow everything downstream
- Lack of systems and processes — tools in place but not fully used yield no benefit
- Market dynamics — external headwinds make leadership and systems even more critical, not less
People decisions: the defining variable
- Hawk Aerospace (helicopter MRO) identified two misfits in leadership within six months — CEO Joe Hawk removed both and stepped into the president role himself
- The design company faced the same issues but delayed; a key operations hire was pregnant, adding legal complexity and hesitation
- The design company then hired three leaders in a 60-day window — too fast, too chaotic, and damaging to culture being built simultaneously
- Rule of thumb: replace no more than one key leader every six months to allow proper onboarding
- Rapid simultaneous hiring works for startups building from scratch; it damages existing companies adopting new culture mid-flight
Holding the line on process adoption
- Hawk's CEO held firm when his team resisted accountability tools — KPIs, huddles, performance targets
- He was explicit: results to date are unacceptable; this is not going away
- Companies that allow teams to opt out of the huddle, reject KPIs, or resist alignment tools don't build the operational foundation needed to scale
- Common objection ("my people don't want to do the huddle") contradicts common complaint ("we operate in silos") — the tools exist to solve the complaint
Cash management
- Both companies faced severe cash pressure through 2015 and into 2016
- Hawk's CFO found cash in inventory and real estate — creative, proactive management
- The design company made a large PLM system investment mid-crisis — the right investment at the wrong time
- Cash is oxygen; you can pull over if you run out of fuel in a car, but not in an aircraft
- Missing one payroll is survivable; missing two is usually fatal
- A strong financial leader is not optional — it's as critical as the CEO
Priority discipline
- The design company tried to fix people, technology, and process simultaneously — none got done well
- Hawk ran a one-two punch: drive sales (using Salesforce, which was already in place but underused) + protect cash
- Weekly tactical meetings kept both priorities visible and on track
- There will always be more to do than time allows — companies that can't narrow to 5–6 annual priorities and 4–5 quarterly priorities can't execute
- Implementing a system you already have beats replacing it with a new one
Sales and business development
- Hawk's sales cycle is 18–36 months — they needed pipeline discipline years before revenue showed up
- Joe drove Salesforce adoption personally as CEO, not delegating it
- They recruited law enforcement and lapsed customers; one hire didn't pan out but the initiative moved forward
- The design company, facing Amazon-driven retail disruption, delayed repositioning and tech investment — both were needed but arrived too late and too expensively
The value of a business coach
- Coaches are effective not because they're smarter but because they're outside the water — not swimming in the day-to-day
- Working across 30 CEOs simultaneously means coaches surface patterns invisible to leaders inside one company
- CEOs often know what to do (purpose, values, BHAG, top-grading) — the gap is consistent execution
- Knowing about a framework and using all of it are different things; partial use produces partial results
Hawk's outcome
- Added ~$10 million in roughly a year
- Built new strategic positioning and a brand promise that opens new markets
- Redid compensation and performance systems
- Launched TinyPulse company-wide — gave floor-level maintenance staff a voice
- Rolled Five Dysfunctions work through the leadership team, extending it into the broader company
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.