The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Selling your B2B SaaS: why most founders leave money on the table
Executive overview
Most founders selling a SaaS business between $2–20M ARR negotiate against a handful of inbound buyers without understanding who is actually buying in that market. 70% of acquisitions in this range are done by private equity, not the strategic acquirers founders expect.
Anar Volset — co-founder of Tiny Seed and founder of Discretion Capital — argues that running a structured auction process targeting 100+ buyers routinely adds 30–300% to initial offers. The "startups are bought, not sold" belief is a VC incentive problem, not a market reality.
Growth rate is the single biggest valuation driver — and founders who wait too long to sell often halve their exit value by letting growth decay.
Who actually buys B2B SaaS at $2–20M ARR
- 70% of buyers are private equity; 20% are strategics; 10% other
- PE buyers target 3–5X returns in 3–5 years — growth makes that math easy, churn makes it scary
- Two deal types: platform acquisitions (the business PE wants to build around) and tuck-ins (bolt-ons to an existing portfolio company)
- Most businesses under $10–15M ARR are tuck-ins, not platforms
- Tuck-ins frequently outbid strategics — the acquired business is worth more to a buyer whose existing customer base can be cross-sold immediately
- Blackstone bought a $4–6M ARR events SaaS as a tuck-in to a $1.3B public company it had taken private
Why the "bought not sold" idea misleads founders
- The phrase originates from VC incentives: VCs only care about M&A if a strategic pays a crazy premium, because that's compatible with their 1% shot at a $20B outcome
- For a bootstrapped or lightly funded founder, a $50M exit is life-changing — but 2% chance of $20B is not a rational trade-off for most
- Only ~7% of actual acquisitions get any mainstream tech press; the market is opaque by default
- Founders who rely on inbound buyers get a narrow, uncompetitive process — often settling for 50% of fair value
- A structured auction creates competitive tension; the right banker understands which PE fund is in the right point of its hold cycle to pay most
The two valuation drivers that matter most
- Growth rate is the top driver; a 5M ARR business growing 100% YoY can be worth more than a 10M ARR business that has stalled
- Churn is second; PE buyers model downside protection — high churn means the customer base could evaporate after the founder walks away
- 8% monthly churn is not "the new normal" — it means the entire customer base turns over in under a year
- ARR multiples, not profit multiples, dominate this market because SaaS gross margins are ~95% and buyers value growth optionality over current profitability
- A break-even business reinvesting into growth is worth more than a profitable business that has stopped growing
The valuation cliff when growth decays
- There is a discontinuity around 20–25% annual growth — above it, multiples rise with growth; below it, they fall sharply
- A business growing 35% might sell for 4–5X ARR; the same business two years later growing 10% may fetch only 1–2X
- Doubling ARR while letting growth decay can cut the exit value by 8 figures
- Founders convince themselves they just need to hit "one more number" — but picking low-hanging fruit often exhausts the growth channels
- The buyer pool changes entirely below 20% growth: growth-oriented PE funds and tuck-in buyers exit the process; only value buyers and turnaround shops remain
Why operator dependency destroys value for larger buyers
- A two-founder, contractor-run business is fine for an SBA-loan operator buyer at $250K ARR
- Above $2M ARR, PE and strategic buyers price in key-person risk heavily — if the founders leave and the business falls apart, the investment thesis fails
- Scraping Bee (Tiny Seed portfolio): founders optimized for profit and avoided hiring; grew to $5M ARR, exited for eight figures — but the founders themselves said they should have hired earlier
- Building a team reduces profit margin but increases acquirer confidence and expands the buyer pool to larger, higher-paying buyers
What a good M&A process looks like
- A banker's core job is identifying the full universe of buyers and placing the asset in front of whoever values it most
- Generic brokers blast email lists — Blackstone does not browse Acquire.com
- Timing matters: PE funds are most likely to buy a tuck-in 6–12 months after acquiring a platform, not 5 years in
- The right banker tracks which fund owns which portfolio company and where each fund is in its lifecycle
- Outreach to 100+ targeted strategic and PE buyers creates genuine competitive tension and prevents any single buyer from anchoring the price
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.