The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Will remote work stick, and what does effective time use actually look like?
Executive overview
Most companies that went remote during the pandemic didn't fix how they work — they just moved the hyperactive hive mind online, making it worse. Without structural change, remote work decays back to in-person.
The long-term shift is coming from a different direction: startups built remote-first from scratch are growing fast, and their knowledge is transferring vertically and horizontally across industries.
Effective time management — not laziness — explains why disciplined schedulers finish the same work in half the time.
The prerequisite for remote work is fixing work itself, not just changing its location.
The future of in-person vs remote work
- Pre-pandemic prediction: full remote would make hyperactive hive mind worse; it did
- Second half of prediction failed: companies tolerated the pain instead of fixing it
- Pandemic chaos drowned out the signal that work itself was broken
- Near-term: most offices will return to largely in-person; hybrid days-at-home won't deliver real remote benefits
- Seed of long-term change: pandemic-era startups built remote-first from scratch
- Competitive advantages — global talent access, lower overhead per hire — let these companies grow fast
- Knowledge transfer: remote-first expertise moves vertically (startup → mid-size) and horizontally via private equity efficiency plays
- Private equity incentive: acquire companies, reduce office overhead, boost returns by making operations remote
- Phase transition expected in 3–4 years: significantly more workers with no permanent office, concentrated first in tech
- Monopolies (Apple, Facebook) will lag — competitive advantage of remote matters less when you dominate the market
Digital nomadism: easier permission, harder reality
- Getting permission to work remotely is now trivial; it was the main obstacle 15 years ago
- But modern hyperactive hive mind makes nomadism pointless — you're on Zoom on the beach, not in the waves
- Ironic trap: just as location freedom became easy to obtain, the work style makes it worthless
- Fix is the same: shift to outcome-driven, structured work first; then location becomes genuinely flexible
- Risk: once everyone is more efficient, expected output rises and free time may disappear anyway
Deep breaks: how to rest without losing focus
- Deep break: a break designed to minimise context-switching cost on return
- Avoid two types of distraction: relevant (related but not identical cognitive context) and emotionally arousing
- Checking email during a break introduces related-but-different context — makes re-entry harder
- Social media is doubly bad: triggers emotion and pulls attention far from the original task
- Physical movement is ideal — uses a completely separate part of the brain
- Low-stakes chat (e.g. construction next door) has minimal impact; Twitter outrage has high impact
- Intensity helps: some people do pull-ups or 1,000m rowing intervals between sessions
Time management vs underwork: what the gap actually means
- Combining GTD full-capture + time blocking + multi-scale planning roughly doubles output efficiency
- Scenario A (reactive, list-based) vs Scenario B (intentional allocation): same work, roughly half the time
- Freed time is not a sign of being underworked — it's the output of working smarter
- Two valid responses: take on more work (stack multiple roles in the same hours) or run a stealth part-time job
- Stealth part-time: fulfil your contract by producing at or above peer level; use remaining time for other priorities
- Those priorities can be a side project, fitness, volunteering, hobbies — not just hustle
- The ethical position: the contract is about output, not hours; meeting output expectations is sufficient
Improving writing without an editor
- Deliberate practice requires feedback; writing without an editor limits development
- Exercise: style replication — deconstruct pieces you admire, then write your own in that style
- Analyse structure (how the argument moves), sentence-level style, pacing
- Newport's own practice: broke down Malcolm Gladwell (New Yorker) and Clive Thompson (New York Magazine) pieces
- Benjamin Franklin's method: deconstruct admired writing, reconstruct similar pieces, then write anonymously under different personas to practise diverse styles
- Mimicry builds a toolkit of styles to draw from; it is not plagiarism — it is controlled deliberate practice
Managing high-volume incoming information
- Unstructured inboxes make assistants nearly useless — they can't impose order on chaos
- Fix the channel first: replace open email with a structured intake form or database submission
- Set expectations upfront: senders know the format, know what response to expect
- Once structured, assistant's role becomes clear: triage, database entry, flag high-probability items for a weekly review
- Weekly review meeting: owner quickly marks follow-up, hold, or pass — no deep reading required
- Caveat: structuring the intake often makes it so manageable that the assistant becomes unnecessary
Structuring leisure time around the deep life buckets
- Open-ended free time with no framework leads to forced, mismatched activity lists
- Better approach: audit each deep life element — community, constitution, contemplation, craft, etc.
- For each bucket ask: what would amplify or meaningfully improve this area of my life?
- Assign activities to buckets rather than generating a random list
- Ensures coverage across dimensions, avoids duplication, gives each activity a reason to exist
RSS and distributed content vs platform monopolies
- RSS era: peer-to-peer subscription, independent sites, implicit quality curation via social capital
- Platform monopolies collapsed that context: all content looks identical regardless of source or credibility
- Google killed Google Reader partly because they couldn't surveil or control the RSS ecosystem
- Distributed curation worked: fringe content stayed on fringe-looking sites; social trust filtered what you saw
- Inside platforms, misinformation looks identical to trusted journalism — context cues are gone
- Independent content creation with direct subscription is more privacy-preserving and produces better implicit quality signals
- The shift to walled gardens was a business decision, not a product improvement
Finding like-minded community
- Deep questions types tend to avoid the platforms most likely to surface other deep questions types — an inherent irony
- Practical tactic: put out the bat signal in existing groups, email lists, or social posts — ask directly
- Deep Work has sold over one million copies; podcast at ~4 million downloads — the audience is large enough to find locally
- Shared profile tends toward: 25–45 knowledge workers, less tribal, open to ideas, suspicious of tech trends, intentional about time
- In-person meetups are more valuable than digital community for this type of connection
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.