The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How Nick Sleep and Qais Zaharia built Nomad Investment Partnership
Executive overview
Most investors chase ephemeral information and trade constantly. Nick Sleep and Zak Zaharia did the opposite: they disconnected from market noise, read deeply, and concentrated heavily in a handful of businesses they understood for decades.
Their framework was simple — find companies that share scale economies with customers, hold them for years, and let compounding do the work. The result: a ~10x return over 14 years, $2 billion in profit for investors, and a retirement at 45.
Good things grow — but only if you let them.
Background and origins
- Sleep grew up comfortable being an outsider; a formative read of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance shaped his conviction that quality of action matters above all else.
- Zaharia fled Iraq as a child after his family was purged; his father later went bankrupt speculating in stocks he didn't understand — a lesson Zak never forgot.
- They met during the 1997 Asian financial crisis: Sleep was hunting cheap stocks at Marathon Asset Management; Zaharia was the iconoclastic broker willing to find what no one else would buy.
- Attending Berkshire Hathaway's annual meeting together was a turning point — Buffett and Munger's long-term owner mindset reframed what investing could be.
- In 2001, Sleep launched Nomad Investment Partnership from within Marathon; Zaharia joined as co-manager.
Principles they built the firm around
- Named Nomad deliberately — willing to go anywhere in search of value, unconstrained by benchmarks.
- One goal: 10x net asset value. They worked backwards from that to decide what to ignore.
- Treated all ephemeral information as perishable: "information, like food, has a sell-by date."
- Practiced intentional disconnection — no broker pitches, no daily news, no macro bets, no options or leverage.
- Applied a "no asshole rule": turned away irritating investors regardless of wealth.
- Spent their time reading annual reports and visiting companies until they were "blue in the face."
Destination analysis
- Asked three questions about every business: Where is it headed in 10–20 years? What must management do today to get there? What could prevent it?
- This framework applied equally to personal decisions — health, relationships, legacy.
- Focused on inputs required to fulfil a business's potential, not on quarterly outputs.
- Sought insights with long shelf lives; dismissed data that would be worthless in 12 weeks.
From cigar butts to quality compounders
- Started by buying deeply cheap assets in Thailand, Zimbabwe, and the US — businesses trading at a quarter of asset replacement cost.
- Realized the flaw: when cheap stocks rebounded, you had to sell and hunt again. The strategy didn't scale.
- The stagecoach mistake crystallized the lesson: bought at 14 cents, sold at 90 cents feeling clever — the stock hit nearly $4. They "felt like horses' asses."
- Shifted to Charlie Munger's view: buy wonderful businesses at fair prices and hold indefinitely, subcontracting capital allocation to great founders.
Scale economies shared — the earned secret
- Studied Walmart, Dell, Southwest, Tesco, Geico, Nebraska Furniture Mart, and Henry Ford's Model T price cuts.
- Identified a single unifying business model: pass the benefits of scale back to customers, creating a loyalty flywheel that compounds over decades.
- Costco was the first company to introduce them to this model (purchased at $30 in 2002, when Wall Street hated the low margins).
- Costco's members saved $5 for every $1 Costco kept — low margins were a feature, not a flaw.
- Virtuous cycle: higher revenues → scale savings → lower costs → lower prices → higher revenues.
- Nick's summary: "Most big successful corporations eventually lapse into mediocrity. Costco kept growing by giving back instead of grabbing all the spoils."
Amazon — the model at internet scale
- Sleep encountered Bezos pitching in London in 1997 but took years to fully grasp Amazon's advantage.
- Recognized Amazon Prime as the Costco membership model applied to e-commerce: "I know exactly what game they're playing."
- Began buying aggressively in 2005 at ~$30/share; at times Amazon represented 70% of the fund.
- Bezos's own words to shareholders (2005) matched their thesis exactly: returning efficiency gains to customers creates a long-term free cash flow flywheel.
- Amazon, Costco, and Berkshire became the three-stock portfolio Sleep held in retirement.
Slow knowledge, then fast action
- Encyclopedic base of knowledge compounds like capital: years of study allow instant pattern recognition.
- Sam Walton ran one store for five years; decades later opened hundreds of Sam's Clubs in a handful of years.
- Li Lu read Value Line cover to cover; later could scan a page in seconds and know if something warranted further investigation.
- Buffett's 50 years of annual report reading lets him filter important from unimportant faster than anyone.
- Nick and Zak's years of deep research meant that when they saw Amazon Prime, they recognized it immediately.
The fund's arc and dissolution
- Nomad fell 45% in 2008; rather than panic, they upgraded the portfolio, concentrating further into highest-quality names.
- Over the following four years, Nomad returned 404%.
- Closed the partnership in early 2014 at ~$3 billion in assets, having returned ~$2 billion in profit.
- Nick's motivation: "It's not the cake that gratifies us. What we found gratifying was the process… the cake was a happy byproduct."
- In retirement, Zaharia kept ~70% of his net worth in Amazon (never sold a personal share). Sleep held Amazon, Costco, and Berkshire.
- By 2018, Amazon had grown to 70%+ of Sleep's net worth; he sold half in a single day at $1,500/share and "hated it."
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.