The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Revenue vs profit, shipping without permission, and why entrepreneurship is not the Olympics
Executive overview
Founders who share MRR without disclosing costs are cherry-picking a headline number. A $2M ARR SaaS company and a $2M revenue e-commerce business are not the same — margins and exit multiples are night and day.
Waiting to be selected — by a studio, a publisher, an investor — is a trap. Bootstrappers don't need permission. The same mental model that stalls aspiring directors stalls aspiring founders.
The difference between a roadblock and a speed bump is the belief that you can get past it.
Revenue vs profit: why MRR without costs misleads
- Sharing top-line revenue is mostly marketing or bragging, rarely genuine transparency
- A $2M ARR SaaS and a $2M revenue e-com business are structurally different: SaaS COGS are typically 5–15%; e-commerce COGS (including Amazon fees, FBA, storage) can reach 50–70%
- Exit multiples follow the same gap: SaaS might sell at 5–7x ARR; e-commerce at 3–5x net profit
- Historically, SaaS costs were low enough that MRR was a fair proxy for health — AI and underlying API costs are changing that
- Sharing expenses alongside revenue gives the full picture; most founders don't because it makes the number less impressive
Shipping without waiting for permission
- A film school graduate who had circulated his reel and got no traction concluded there was nothing else he could do — every alternative suggestion got a reason why it wouldn't work
- That defeatism — turning speed bumps into roadblocks — is the same pattern in aspiring founders who won't make it
- Bootstrapping sidesteps the gatekeeper problem: Kevin Smith and Robert Rodriguez made films without studio approval; Start Small, Stay Small was self-published without a publisher's blessing
- The difference is not optimism — it's shipping something into the world despite uncertainty, then iterating
- Surround yourself with people who ship; find them online if you don't know any in person
Vision ahead of available technology: the George Lucas model
- Lucas's taste in visual effects and sound exceeded what any existing company could deliver, so he built new ones — Industrial Light and Magic for VFX, THX surround sound for cinema audio
- ILM eventually became one of the world's top effects studios; THX redefined theater sound quality
- Lucas was not a great writer or director by conventional standards — the films he didn't write or direct (Empire Strikes Back) are widely considered the best — but he had a clear vision and hired people capable of realising it
- The lesson for founders: current tech stacks and LLM constraints are not permanent ceilings; if your vision is ahead of the available tooling, build toward it
Hard work is necessary but not sufficient — and that's good news
- Mike Tyson's training: 4 a.m. five-mile jog; 2,000 sit-ups, 500 push-ups, 500 dips, 500 shrugs, 30 minutes of neck bridges — six days a week
- Doing the exact same regimen would not produce another heavyweight champion; genetics, fast-twitch muscle fibers, and timing all matter
- In sport and elite performance, there is one winner; in entrepreneurship there are thousands of successful outcomes at wildly varying scales
- Hard work and skills are controllable; starting conditions vary but are less determinative in business than in sport
- ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other neurological differences have produced successful founders — some of those traits become advantages in the startup context
- You don't need to be world-class to build generational wealth, change your family's trajectory, or run a company at $10K–$500K/month
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.