The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Rec Room: how a VR startup pivoted to a cross-platform metaverse
Executive overview
Rec Room launched as a VR-only app, then watched the VR market flatline for two years. Rather than fold or hard-pivot away from VR, the team expanded to screens and mobile while simultaneously handing content creation to users. The combination of multi-platform reach, user-generated content, and an in-game creator economy produced 660% revenue growth in 2020 and a $1.25 billion valuation.
The core insight: if your growth is governed by someone else's growth, you must find a second engine — or die waiting.
Founding story and the VR bet
- Team formed from Microsoft HoloLens rejects who couldn't get hired at Oculus, Magic Leap, or Google
- Company named Against Gravity because HoloLens was codenamed "Gravity" — a signal of how little the plan was defined
- Got into VR via an HTC Vive loaned by friends at Valve; still hoped Microsoft would re-enter consumer AR
- Rec Room is one unified world of millions of user-built rooms — battle royales, escape rooms, fashion shows, weddings — accessible across VR, Xbox, PlayStation, PC, iOS
The VR plateau and the decision to go multiplatform
- After 5x growth Oct–Dec 2017, team sobered up: no headsets were on the hardware horizon for 24 months
- VR user base showed zero growth from December 2017 through late 2019
- Two bets made simultaneously: open creation tools to users (not just staff), and launch on non-VR platforms
- First flat-screen launch was PlayStation (without headset), then PC — community backlash was significant
- Key mistake: mixing all users into the same rooms regardless of intent; community felt their VR identity was diluted
- Learned the platform can only evolve at a certain metabolic rate — change pushed too hard, too fast
Why VR architecture gave a hidden cross-platform advantage
- Screen games have finite player actions bounded by button combinations
- VR origin meant player actions were always infinite: crawling, juggling, backflipping — any motion is possible
- Creator rooms were built around unanticipated behaviors; a flat-screen port had to preserve that flexibility
- Nick's own bad call: pushed for third-person view on screens, wasting ~six months of dev time
- Final solution: first-person with independent hand control that approximates VR expressiveness on flat screens
- One unified world (not forked VR vs. flat versions) preserves economic and social liquidity across all users
Building the creator economy
- Started by giving avatar items for levelling up → switched to soft currency → added ability to purchase currency → shifted earning from platform rewards to peer-to-peer creator payouts
- In gaming textbook terms: broke every rule (merged hard and soft currencies, converted one to the other mid-flight)
- Two-year intentional transition managed by a designer with mobile gaming background and a dev lead — no economist
- Creators can charge tokens inside rooms; Rec Room pays out real money once thresholds are met
- 15–16 year old creators earning $6,000–7,000/month; 2 million of 15 million users are active creators
- Centralized control of the economy is a feature, not a bug: allowed the team to evolve rules without being locked into a white paper
Growth flywheel and business model
- Creator-led growth replaces paid user acquisition: creators evangelize to their own sub-communities
- Performance marketing is inherently anti-scale (each incremental dollar buys worse-fit users); creators invert this
- Revenue margins slightly lower on UGC sales (creator payout) but far more scalable than staff-built content
- Float dynamic: users buy tokens upfront; creators cash out over time — similar accounting dynamic to Roblox
- Rec Room only started experimenting with paid advertising two months before this recording
- Series B (April 2019, Index) raised on the story of cross-platform + UGC pivot; revenue was ~$20k/month at the time
- Series C (November 2020, Madrona, $20M) raised eight months into the pandemic
- January 2021: $100M raised at $1.25B from Sequoia and Index — first round initiated by investors, not the team
Seven powers analysis (live with CEO)
- Network economies: high coefficient because creator conversion rate is far above typical platforms; each creator multiplies value for all users
- Scale economies: larger audience means creators earn more per viral hit; early mover advantage compounds
- Switching costs: creator skills are non-transferable to Unity/Unreal/Roblox Studio; audience and notification graph lock creators in
- Counter-positioning vs. Roblox: Rec Room is Instagram to Roblox's Photoshop — same person can create and consume in one session; Roblox has a ~20-year age gap between creators and players
- NFTs and crypto explicitly rejected: decentralisation would destroy the economic control that makes Rec Room's evolution possible
What the A scenario looks like
- Transcend gaming the way Minecraft and Fortnite did — become part of popular culture
- Creator incentives scale high enough that creators quit day jobs, form teams, build studios inside Rec Room
- True platform test: other people building businesses on top of Rec Room's business
- B-minus risk: complacency — celebrating past wins instead of treating each funding round as the start of a new game
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.