The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Jim Simons: how a mathematician built the world's best trading machine
Executive overview
Most investors try to understand why markets move. Simons ignored the why entirely and built a system that just needed to be right 51% of the time. After a decade of failed partnerships and mounting losses, his Medallion Fund achieved average annual returns of 66% from 1988 onward — never recording a down year.
The core insight: markets are a pattern-recognition problem, not an economic one — and humans are the noise to be modeled, not the analysts to do the modeling.
Early life and the persistent pull toward wealth
- At 14, Simons declared he would study math at MIT; people laughed; it didn't register.
- From his father he took one lesson: do what you love, not what's expected.
- His first wife noted: "Jim understood at an early age that money is power. He did not want people to have power over him."
- While earning his PhD at Berkeley, he drove to San Francisco each morning to trade commodities at Merrill Lynch before class.
- He described himself as always feeling like an outsider — a self-image he leaned into rather than shed.
The IDA years and the origins of the method
- At 26 he joined the Institute for Defense Analysis to break Soviet codes — earning more than academia paid, with half his time free for his own research.
- There he developed his thinking style: lying still for hours, eyes closed, grinding through problems in silence.
- He and colleagues wrote an early paper asking whether markets could be predicted without economic theory — no interest in why, only in what the patterns suggested.
- He was fired at 29 for publicly opposing the Vietnam War; he later called it "a good thing — you just don't want to make a habit of it."
Building Stony Brook's math department (ages 30–40)
- Hired to build a world-class math department, Simons learned to recruit and manage elite, difficult personalities.
- He defined the people he wanted as killers: "those with a single-minded focus who wouldn't quit."
- He coined a distinction he repeated for decades: "There are guys, and then there are real guys. You want the real ones."
- He spent, by his own description, "a lot of time courting talent" — treating recruitment as a core leadership function.
- His five guiding principles, published in 2020, grew from habits formed here: above all, surround yourself with the smartest people you can find.
Launching the firm and a decade of struggle (ages 40–50)
- Left academia at 40 to trade currencies; his father called it a mistake; his mathematician peers thought he had "sold his soul."
- Guiding principle one: "Do something new. Don't run with the pack. If I am one of N people working on the same problem, there is very little chance I will win."
- He and successive partners built partially automated systems but kept abandoning them when intuition-based trading was making money.
- Partner Leonard Baum racked up $43 million in profits trading by instinct — then lost it all, triggering a forced break-up clause.
- A second partner, James Axe, resisted Simons's push toward short-term algorithmic trading; their partnership also collapsed.
- By 1989, the fund was down $20 million and colleagues thought Simons might shut it all down.
The breakthrough: shorter holds and the casino model
- Elwyn Berlekamp, brought in to help, analyzed which trades had actually won — and found the short-term ones dominated.
- His insight: "Buying and selling infrequently magnifies the consequence of each move. Make a lot of trades and each individual move is less important."
- Target: resemble a casino — handle so many bets that a 51% win rate, compounded at scale, becomes overwhelming.
- Medallion cut average holding time to a day and a half. Results were "almost immediate, startling nearly everyone in the office."
- Medallion scored a 55.9% gain in 1990 after a 4% loss the prior year; daily million-dollar profits became routine.
- Even then, outsiders mocked the methods and called the team "quacks."
Conviction as the differentiating asset
- Berlekamp sold his stake during the 55.9% year, believing 30% annual returns were the ceiling. Simons thought 80% was possible.
- Simons bought him out; Berlekamp left believing he had won a six-times return in 16 months.
- Pattern across all departing partners: none of them believed what they had. Simons had belief and conviction; they had intelligence only.
- Simons to a friend after his last partner left: "To hell with it. I'm just going to run this myself."
Data as structural advantage
- From the beginning, Simons collected more historical price data than any competitor — buying World Bank books, reels of magnetic tape, sending staff to the Federal Reserve by hand.
- Sandor Strauss built and cleaned the database: "more accurate data than anyone else — a massive advantage."
- Some weekly stock data stretched back to the 1800s.
- Later: "We take in terabytes of data every day. We store it, massage it, and get it ready for analysis. You're looking for anomalies."
- A data-entry error once caused Medallion to buy five times its intended wheat futures position, moving the market. The Wall Street Journal attributed the price surge to fears of a poor harvest. Peter Brown (Renaissance CEO): "Anytime you hear financial experts talking about how the market went up because of such and such — remember it is all nonsense."
System design and incentive architecture
- Medallion used a single monolithic trading system; every employee had full access to every line of source code.
- Simons insisted: "You need to make everyone partners. Share all the profits."
- By 2002, fees rose to 30% of profits; later 44%. Investors asked how they could put in more.
- In 2003, he kicked all outside investors out of the fund. Only Simons and employees could hold Medallion shares.
- If you left Renaissance, you lost access to Medallion — eliminating the incentive to leave.
- Result: near-zero employee turnover. Knowledge compounded uninterrupted.
- Operating with ~300 employees, the fund generated $5–7 billion annually in its peak years.
How they thought about markets
- "What you're really modeling is human behavior. Humans are most predictable in times of high stress. They act instinctively and they panic."
- "Our entire premise was that human actors will react the same way humans did in the past. We learned to take advantage."
- They hired from IBM's computational linguistics department: speech recognition and stock prediction share the same structure — digesting uncertain jumbles of information to generate reliable guesses about what comes next.
- They deleted company names from stock data and replaced them with numbers, to prevent human intuition from overriding the model.
- Simons on not understanding why the model made its decisions: "I don't know why planets orbit the sun. That doesn't mean I can't predict them."
Secrecy as competitive moat
- "Visibility invites competition. With all due respect to the principles of free enterprise, the less competition, the better. Our only defense is to keep a low profile."
- Simons quoting Benjamin the donkey from Animal Farm: "God gave me a tail to keep off the flies. But I'd rather have no tail and no flies."
- Renaissance never hired from the financial industry: "We never did because they don't have anything to add."
Jim's five guiding principles
- Do something new. Don't run with the pack.
- Surround yourself with the smartest people you can find.
- Be guided by beauty — in math, in poetry, in an organization running well.
- Don't give up easily. Some things take much longer than initially expected.
- Hope for good luck.
Final advice Simons said he would give his 20-year-old self: "It is very important to enjoy your work. Find something you love and then put your heart and soul into it."
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.