How The Rag Company used EOS to scale fast and filter opportunities

Executive overview

Growing 150–300% annually is exhilarating until it isn't. Without a system to evaluate which opportunities to pursue, growth becomes unsustainable and leadership becomes reactive.

The Rag Company adopted EOS (Entrepreneurial Operating System) to bring structure to rapid scaling, clarify the visionary/integrator split, and build a leadership team capable of running the business without constant founder involvement.

The integrator is the tiebreaker — and trusting that fully is the visionary's hardest and most important job.

Company origin and early growth

  • Jeff and his wife Carolyn purchased The Rag Company in 2012 from a founder in hospice — the business sold microfiber towels out of a garage with no digital systems.
  • Customer base included Tesla Motors, the Ritz-Carlton, and major hotel brands — none of which they knew about until after the purchase.
  • A viral YouTube video titled "The World's Best Microfiber" triggered explosive demand; they responded by calling in family and friends to pack orders.
  • That moment confirmed two things: social media would be the primary growth engine, and automotive detailing — not janitorial or beauty — was the core market.
  • Growth ran at 150–300% annually for the first few years; now holding at ~60–65% per year.
  • Strategy is education-first: build trust through content, never push products. One cold call ever — it failed.
  • Now 10 employees dedicated solely to YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok content.

Why EOS, and when

  • Carolyn read Traction on a colleague's recommendation; recognised the company's situation immediately.
  • The trigger: Jeff's instinct to pursue every opportunity was unsustainable. No mechanism existed to evaluate which ones to take and which to decline.
  • At implementation start, the company had ~39–40 employees.
  • Prior decision-making was a three-person committee (Jeff, Carolyn, John) — functional but not scalable.
  • First meeting with EOS implementer Jennifer was enough to commit: "What's the next step, Jennifer?"

The visionary/integrator split

  • Jeff landed in the visionary seat: creative, opportunity-driven, high-energy, prone to wanting everything.
  • John landed in the integrator seat: already running day-to-day alongside Jeff for years, a natural transition.
  • The hardest conversation was with Carolyn — co-owner and spouse — who wasn't in either seat. Jennifer facilitated a working session to clarify her role and the benefits of the structure.
  • Carolyn sits on the leadership team and attends the weekly Level 10; she's being brought into a monthly owner's box meeting to stay aligned without being in the VI same-page loop.
  • Jeff and John were able to step into their seats exclusively from day one — uncommon at implementation start.

The same-page meeting in practice

  • Weekly cadence: Monday afternoon, before Tuesday's Level 10.
  • Informal format: check-in, then work through each person's list in turn, creating to-dos and follow-ups as they go.
  • Occasionally done by phone when schedules conflict; otherwise in-person in Jeff's office.
  • Value: replaces ad-hoc interruptions with a structured checkpoint. Jeff knows John will ask about open items; it creates natural accountability.
  • Speeds resolution — cuts through noise to reach decisions faster.
  • Keeps the relationship connected when they may not otherwise cross paths for days.

Level 10 meeting evolution

  • Early L10s: team was tentative, then overcorrected to aggressive debate; sessions ran long with 25–30 issues, getting through only 8.
  • Core friction: the team felt decisions were still being made by the three owners and brought to them, not made in the room.
  • Shift: Jeff and John now pre-align in the same-page meeting, then bring issues to the L10 for genuine team input and in-room decisions.
  • The team is now empowered to make decisions at the table — a qualitatively different experience of accountability.
  • Issue list now sits at 12–15 items and they get through all of them. Issues have also matured from noise to substance.
  • Jeff's learning: stop interjecting. Let people succeed — and occasionally fail. John facilitated this by pulling Jeff back when needed.

Integrator in practice — John's perspective

  • Team accepted John quickly because he'd already been running operations with Jeff for years — no new authority dynamic to navigate.
  • Bigger transition: getting the team to understand how decisions would now be made and that their input would actually shape outcomes.
  • Ongoing work: delegating real decision-making power down, building genuine accountability, not just the appearance of it.
  • John as translator: ownership and team will not always agree — the integrator's job is to understand both sides and move the message clearly in both directions.

Opportunity filtering — the core EOS payoff

  • Jeff's instinct: grab every opportunity. His own words: "That's also the stupidest idea."
  • Framework: John serves as the check on new ideas. The same-page meeting is the structured moment where opportunities are evaluated before they hit the team.
  • Key insight from the podcast host: "The biggest threat to a visionary's great idea is their next great idea."
  • EOS gave them a mechanism to slow down, assess bandwidth, and say no with clarity — something they lacked entirely before.

Looking ahead — the evolving VI relationship

  • Jeff's goal: step back from day-to-day, stay engaged with vision, R&D, new markets, and new products.
  • Immediate blocker: learning to stay out of the way.
  • Longer-term question: how much visionary energy the business will need as it matures — the answer depends on complexity, growth rate, and team strength.
  • John's goal: within 2–3 years, Jeff is involved in ideas and direction but not boots-on-ground. Same-page meetings focus on strategic opportunities; John handles execution.
  • The host's framing: the visionary doesn't need to be present all the time, but must stay connected to the integrator and participate in quarterly and annual planning.

Key learnings

  • Jeff (visionary): John is the tiebreaker. Relinquishing that control felt impossible a year ago; today it's instinctive. The work to build alignment and trust makes it possible.
  • John (integrator): Open your mind to both sides. Translate ownership's direction to the team and team's reality back to ownership. Being the middle piece is the job.

More like this — when you're ready for early access.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Get early access to the full library.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.