Original source details coming soon.
Character, courage, and leading as if it's your last job
Executive overview
Leaders routinely delay hard decisions — waiting for a better moment, more security, or a later term. The cost is that they never make them. McChrystal and Holiday examine how character shapes every consequential choice, from military command to parenting to institutional integrity.
The core insight: if you're not going to do the right thing now, you're probably never going to do it.
Acting as if it's your last job
- Promotion creates conservatism — those closest to the next rank take the fewest risks
- LBJ's civil rights decision illustrates the alternative: use the power you have, now
- "Maintaining access for future influence" is rationalisation for inaction
- Term limits, tenure, and golden parachutes exist precisely to enable hard decisions — most leaders waste that protection
- Resigning your career identity can be liberating if character remains intact
The cost of delayed integrity
- People who plan to "do good later" after accumulating wealth rarely do
- Telling yourself a decision can be deferred already makes it deferrable — and then permanent
- CEOs with economic tenure still don't use it; fear of public pile-on outweighs job security
- Coaches avoid statistically correct fourth-down calls because perception matters more than reality
- Social media amplifies the cost of seeming wrong, further distorting decision-making
Groupthink, honest feedback, and institutional character
- Good people with grave doubts stay silent — Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis both illustrate this
- Kennedy left the room during ExComm so his presence wouldn't suppress dissent
- Putin almost certainly received no honest opposition before invading Ukraine
- Selecting for loyalty over honesty eliminates the feedback loop a leader depends on
- An adversarial but supportive voice (a spouse, a board) is more valuable than a validating one
- Guilds, licensing boards, press clubs, and professional communities enforce cultural norms that law cannot
Resilience after career-defining setbacks
- Stockdale chose not to let captivity redefine him; McChrystal made the same choice after resigning
- The alternative — becoming embittered, switching teams, seeking grievance — is the more common path
- Acknowledging responsibility without letting the event become your identity is the operative move
- Setbacks in mid-career can be gifts: enough runway remains to build something new
Parenting, character, and what children are actually for
- Children inherit a version of you, not the version you intend — emulating behaviour or rejecting it
- Fighting over surface things (hair, music, car seats) leaves scar tissue; the substance is the relationship
- A child's experience of their childhood is valid even when parental intentions were good
- Telling your child you're proud of them while alive matters more than a file of newspaper clippings found after death
- "Rich" is your kids voluntarily spending time with you — not the bank account or the plane
Moral courage in institutions under pressure
- Lawful orders can still be deeply wrong; the line between duty and conscience is personal
- Dissenting inside an organisation signals to peers and superiors simultaneously — it can shift the room
- Vietnam's eventual wind-down reflects accumulated pushback from soldiers, not just leaders
- When a boss punishes you for declining an illegal order, that tells you everything about the job
- Iterative discussion over days or weeks changes minds — the Cuban Missile Crisis took 13 days
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.