The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Recovering from burnout as a leader: radical honesty and rebuilding culture
Executive overview
Hiding burnout from your team creates a false sense of security — they likely sense it anyway. Dr. Amantha Imber spent most of 2024 concealing her exhaustion while her company's culture and financials deteriorated, hoping things would self-correct.
They didn't. Recovery came through radical transparency, deliberate culture change, and acting on instinct rather than waiting out the storm.
Hiding leadership burnout compounds the damage; naming it is the first move toward recovery.
The shadow side of long tenure
- Long-tenured employees can block new ideas by citing past failures as permanent evidence
- Innovation consultancy Inventium found itself guilty of the same anti-innovation pattern it coaches clients to avoid
- Newer employees brought on for fresh thinking often go quiet or leave when their ideas are dismissed
- Therapist research: training length is a weak predictor of outcomes; curiosity and openness matter more
- Tenure drop at Inventium coincided with fresher thinking — a counterintuitive gain
- Attachment to legacy or "the heyday" is distinct from tenure but equally limiting
Catastrophising and the cost of freeze
- Imber's lowest-point fear: having to tell the whole team their jobs were gone
- Reframing the worst case revealed she had identity and income outside Inventium
- The fear was primarily about others' wellbeing and livelihood, not self-preservation
- Hoping a situation resolves on its own is not a strategy — it delays the moves that actually help
- Metrics make business deterioration visible in ways relationships and health often don't; ignoring them is a choice
Founder-CEO tension and suppressed ideas
- As founder but not CEO, Imber self-censored to avoid undermining her appointed leader
- A gen AI initiative she proposed in 2023 was dismissed; by late 2024 it became a quarter to a third of company revenue
- The cost of deference: a multi-year opportunity gap on a high-conviction idea
- Balance between founder autonomy and CEO autonomy is real — but conviction should be surfaced, not buried
Radical transparency versus oversharing
- Imber hid her burnout fearing the team would lose confidence in her and the business
- Team members sensed it anyway — concealment created false rather than genuine security
- Radical transparency: sharing what serves the team, not what serves the sharer
- Oversharing is self-oriented — seeking attention, validation, or sense-making at others' expense
- Leaders carry confidential information that limits context-sharing, but most err too far toward silence
- Vulnerability builds trust and credibility, especially in work that involves coaching others through similar challenges
Turning point and recovery markers
- A full-team off-site in January 2025 was the clearest signal things had shifted
- The change came not from time passing but from deliberate actions taken during that time
- Organisations ebb and flow like relationships and health — fixedness is not a sign of stability
- Sharing the burnout story publicly helped other leaders feel less alone
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.