The original is one click away. Open original ↗
How to build minimum lovable products and grow as a PM
Executive overview
Most PMs jump to solutions before understanding the problem. The real job is to understand users deeply, edit possibilities, and lead through influence — not authority.
Minimum lovable product replaces MVP as the standard: do fewer things at a high quality bar rather than many things partially. Know why users love your product, then double down on that core instead of chasing adjacent bets.
The most common PM mistakes
- New PMs attach to a solution before understanding the problem — the core thing to un-teach
- PMs expect authority over what gets built; the job is actually influence and editing, not control
- Jumping to solution space without validating unit economics leads to costly failures
- Sunk cost fallacy extends failing bets — pre-define go/no-go milestones at every quarter
Minimum lovable product vs MVP
- MVP sets a low quality bar; MLP asks what quality actually resonates with your users
- MLP is context-dependent: if users are replacing spreadsheets, the bar is lower; if users are designers, it's higher
- Better to do five things excellently than 15 things adequately — users notice the difference
- "Pixie dust" moments — keyboard shortcuts, pre-populated templates — create disproportionate love
- If you can't reach MLP internally, decide whether your ecosystem can close the gap
The Airbnb Plus failure
- Airbnb Plus tried to solve trust through physical home inspections — expensive and unscalable
- The real problem: guests didn't know what they'd get; better reviews and structured host onboarding were the right solutions
- WeWork made the same error: over-indexed on tech when the core was inventory management
- Inspections cost more than lockboxes or local cleaning partnerships — cheaper solutions existed
- Unit economics must work at the beginning, not at hypothetical future scale
- When pushing back on a founder, return with the spirit of their goal plus better options
Roadmapping and prioritization
- A roadmap is a story, not a spreadsheet — articulate themes so the team understands why, not just what
- RICE scores and impact/effort columns don't replace a narrative
- Write roadmaps as docs, not decks — docs scale better in async and remote cultures
- Link out to live Jira tickets rather than static snapshots that go stale
- Themes should change when you learn major new things about users — the story absorbs new inputs
OKRs
- Start from qualitative clarity: what would make you say "we crushed it"?
- Sandbagging OKRs to stay green is a company-level innovation failure
- Prefer red OKRs with clear learnings over green OKRs that signal nothing
- Break ambitious north stars into quarterly milestones with explicit go/no-go decisions
- Culture must not punish ambitious misses — risk-taking requires psychological safety
Career acceleration for PMs
- Become known for one thing: complex launches, technical depth, regulatory work, execution — then get more responsibility
- Build a reputation that earns you bigger projects, not a title that assumes authority
- Early career: analytical strength and execution compound fast
- As you move into leadership, the thing you're known for shifts — flex the core strength into new forms
The WeWork year
- Over-hiring ahead of validated milestones is a structural risk — laying people off is a permanent cost to leadership credibility
- Empathy is a leadership competency: a team in crisis needs a leader who considers visa timelines and personal situations
- Unlock hiring gates tied to results, not ambition
- Big visions don't require big teams — WeWork needed better inventory tools, not a platform engineering org
First 90 days as a product leader
- Prioritise building contacts across functions and levels — not just your direct team and peers
- Talk to long-tenure engineers; they know what's hard about the tech stack
- Treat trust as a bank account: deposit before you withdraw — pushing for change too early costs more than it gains
- Set a plan before any leave or transition: assign research tasks, flag strategic gaps, surface blockers to the board
- The biggest trade-off: deep product knowledge vs. organisational context — choose based on your team's existing expertise
Core lesson across Dropbox, Airbnb, WeWork, Webflow
- Dropbox: chasing Slack instead of investing in sync performance; people loved the simplicity
- Airbnb: inspecting homes instead of deepening discovery, reviews, and host onboarding
- WeWork: platform engineering instead of inventory management excellence
- Webflow: investing in non-designer features instead of doubling down on the designer and CMS
The common principle: understand why users love you, double down on that, and build adjacencies from strength — not from competitive fear.
Asking for help as a leadership principle
- The best leaders explicitly say "I don't know" and ask their teams, peers, and mentors
- Asking for help produces better answers than solving alone — and models the behaviour you want from your team
- Apply it to strategy: AI is changing weekly; no product leader has complete context alone
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.