Original source details coming soon.
Project management in hybrid and remote work: why most projects fail
Executive overview
Three in five projects fail — and that was before remote work made coordination harder. Phil Simon argues that the shift to hybrid work hasn't created new problems so much as it has amplified existing ones: unclear roles, mismatched tools, and poor written communication.
His book offers nine prescriptions to improve odds of success — not guarantees, but statistically sound plays. The core tools are simple: agree on tech early, run pre-mortems, set role clarity via RACI, and invest in writing quality.
Most project failures trace back to people problems, not technical ones.
Why projects break bad
- Three out of five projects fail even in synchronous, in-office environments
- Root cause analysis consistently leads back to human factors: unclear expectations, poor communication, ignored documentation
- Remote and hybrid work amplify cognitive biases — you can't read the room when half the room isn't visible
- Silent stakeholders are especially dangerous: they disengage, then surface grievances late
- Asynchronous communication turns five-minute clarifications into five-day delays
Agile vs. waterfall: choosing the right method
- Agile (e.g. Scrum) works for iterative products where imperfection is recoverable — a broken app update won't kill anyone
- Waterfall (phase-gate) suits high-stakes projects where the thing must work from launch — drugs, aircraft, regulated systems
- Both methodologies suffer from the same underlying people problems regardless of approach
Settle early on the tech
- Tool fragmentation kills projects: if teammates use different platforms, messages fall through the gaps
- Agreeing on tools upfront is necessary but not sufficient — you must also enforce that agreement
- Sunk cost fallacy keeps teams locked into software everyone hates; switching mid-project is painful but often correct
- Vet partners by the tools they use — a firm that runs on email alone signals higher project risk
- Automatic (Automattic) tests hires with a small paid project before committing; the same logic applies to vendors
RACI: clarifying who does what
- RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) prevents the common failure where someone expected to be consulted finds out they were only informed
- Especially critical in async work where misunderstandings compound silently across days or weeks
- Defining RACI at project start is a low-effort intervention with outsized impact
Pre-mortems over post-mortems
- A pre-mortem assumes the project has already failed, then asks why — before it happens
- Hertz spent $32 million on a website and app in 2016 that failed catastrophically; a pre-mortem might have surfaced the risks early
- A pilot phase (e.g. $200K scoped prototype) stress-tests the team and tools before full commitment
- Post-mortems capture lessons after the damage; pre-mortems prevent it
Writing as a project management tool
- In hybrid work, written communication carries more load than ever — you can't tap someone on the shoulder
- Poor writing multiplies message volume: unclear messages generate 13 follow-ups instead of one or two
- Amazon and Automattic have brought in writing coaches to raise baseline quality across teams
- Using tools like Slack or Teams only helps if people can write clearly within them; the tool doesn't fix the message
The case for hybrid (not fully remote)
- ~92% of employees report being as productive remotely; ~96% of managers agree
- Flexibility on where and when to work is now a baseline expectation for most knowledge workers — not a perk
- Fully remote removes the serendipitous relationship-building that makes teams trust each other
- In-person time doesn't need to be constant — twice-yearly gatherings can serve the bonding function
- Proximity bias (rewarding visible presence over actual output) is the failure mode of mandated office return
What unofficial project managers can do now
- Most people are de facto project managers whether or not they hold the title — freelancers, side hustlers, and team leads all qualify
- Start any project by aligning on tools, channels, and role expectations before any work begins
- Use a RACI matrix even for small projects; it takes minutes and prevents expensive misunderstandings
- Run a pre-mortem in the kickoff phase — assume failure and ask why
- Treat writing quality as a project infrastructure issue, not a soft skill
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.