The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi on turning around a verb
Executive overview
Uber burned more capital before its IPO than any company in history, then lost 85% of mobility volume overnight during the pandemic. Dara Khosrowshahi joined mid-crisis, with a mandate to reach profitability rather than a grand strategy.
The turnaround rested on a supply-led growth model borrowed from Booking.com, merging rides and eats into a single earner and marketplace platform, and eliminating high-vote shares to end the board power struggle. Compounding now makes the structural advantages visible.
The invisible hand really does set ride prices — Uber's job is to wire up every form of transport and reduce take rate as far as possible.
Early career: Barry Diller and the value of unvarnished truth
- Dara joined Allen & Company as an analyst straight from engineering school, chasing a woman to New York City
- Got assigned to Barry Diller's hostile bid for Paramount Pictures against Sumner Redstone
- When his supervisor fell ill, he presented his LBO model directly to Diller
- Diller's pattern: go to the source, skip edited versions of reality
- Herb Allen's philosophy: "bet on people, not companies" — the same loyalty Dara later modelled at Uber
- Advice to young people: don't over-plan, stay open to opportunities, and when you're in — go all in
Buying Expedia right after 9/11
- IAC had signed a term sheet to acquire Expedia before September 11, 2001; a MAC clause allowed them to walk
- Rich Barton called Barry Diller and gave him a clean out — without pressure
- The team debated, then Barry said: "If there isn't travel, there isn't life"
- Called Rich back: game on, no changes to the deal
- Lesson Dara carried forward: in the centre of the storm things look permanent; they revert
What Uber learned from Booking.com
- Expedia was demand-led (brand, air-first); Booking was supply-led (hotels, hotels, hotels)
- Booking targeted fragmented supply — more hotels meant more data, better conversion, cheaper Google traffic
- Uber has 5.6 million drivers and couriers — the most fragmented supply base in transport
- Post-pandemic growth came from rebuilding driver supply first, not demand
- Eats functions as a structural recruitment tool: couriers onboard faster (no car inspection), then get upsold to driving
- As supply improves, surge drops, ETAs fall, prices fall — demand follows
How the rides and eats flywheel compounded
- Once Eats reached scale, all technical and marketplace teams were merged into one
- Rides is the largest customer acquisition channel for Eats — at a quarter of the cost of paid channels
- Cross-promotion required experimentation: wrong surface or frequency hurts the rides experience
- New Eats customers are under 10% of volume in any year; the value is compounding repeat cohorts
- After three years of the machinery running, margins grow faster than competitors because of proprietary traffic
- On supply: Eats lets Uber recruit couriers who eventually transition to driving people
Why Uber prices rose — and why they're now falling
- Blue-collar wage expectations rose across the economy; driver earnings had to keep pace
- This was healthy catch-up: tech and capital wages had pulled far ahead
- Counter-cyclicality: in strong economies, supply is scarce and expensive; in soft economies, more drivers join, prices fall
- Q1 2023: trip growth accelerated to 24% vs 19% in Q4 — unusual at Uber's scale
- Uber's top economist argues the marketplace sets its own spot price; Uber does not control it
- Marketplace matching and pricing improve ~5% per year through ML — compounding on a $120–130B run rate
The CEO recruitment and shareholder base reset
- Daniel Ek gave the headhunter Dara's number and told him: "Since when is life about having fun? It's about impact"
- Dara told the board: the nanosecond my name appears in the press, I'm out — the secret held for two months
- Barry Diller reacted badly, then called back: "Speaking as chairman it's a mistake; speaking as a friend, how can I help?" — and edited Dara's board presentation
- After Dara joined, Travis Kalanick sold roughly 15% of the company at IPO lock-up expiration; stock fell, team panicked
- Over several years, Uber's entire shareholder base turned over — from growth and hedge funds to fundamental long-only holders like Fidelity, Capital, and Morgan Stanley
Eliminating high-vote shares: an 80-billion-dollar prisoner's dilemma
- SoftBank wanted to invest; Masa hinted he'd back Lyft instead if Uber didn't comply
- Founders and early investors held high-vote shares; selling would flip votes to low-vote — a game of chicken
- The solution: get every high-vote shareholder to agree simultaneously to convert to low votes
- If anyone defected, the whole structure collapsed — and SoftBank's $10–15B could have gone to Lyft
- Once done, no one could control the company; the power struggle ended
- Secondary benefit: focus shifted from "who controls Uber" to "how do we build a great company"
Competitive landscape: DoorDash, Lyft, and taxis
- DoorDash bet on suburbs and selection; Uber bet on urban, cheap, and fast — a bias that persisted through 2018–19
- Suburbs have larger families, higher food delivery demand; Uber under-indexed there
- Urban Eats share vs DoorDash is now "quite constructive"; suburbs remain DoorDash's profit pool
- Lyft: stronger than people give it credit for; new CEO is making moves; never count them out
- Taxis: 4.5 million globally — Uber is now wiring them up via blast dispatch (one-to-many offer) rather than one-to-one match
- Freight, grocery, alcohol, health transport, two- and three-wheelers: all segments in the "wire everything that moves" strategy
The case for lower take rates
- Expedia's take rate was 25%; Booking's was 15%; over 13 years Dara took Expedia from 25% to ~17%
- Those percentage points are pure margin — no value created, just extraction
- Uber's gross bookings grew ~22% last quarter; driver and courier earnings (including tips) grew 30%
- The goal: operate at the lowest sustainable take rate by eliminating fraud, automating, and improving efficiency
- High take rates are dangerous long-term — they cap ecosystem growth and invite competition
- "Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered"
Self-driving cars and the limits of prediction
- The last 2% of edge cases is unknowable — no one can say when full autonomy arrives
- The real question is what safety level society will accept: 10x safer still means ~4,000 US deaths per year
- After the fatal Phoenix incident, Uber redesigned its safety-first development process, then exited self-driving during the pandemic
- Uber's core skill is demand-supply matching at scale, not AV hardware
- Waymo and Aurora are now partners — a hybrid model where Uber's matching layer routes to either human or robot driver
- 98% fulfillment rate is the bar; any single AV provider will struggle to cover all origins and destinations alone
Building for earners — the cultural shift
- For most of Uber's history, the driver app was built like a consumer product: A/B tested, optimised for throughput
- A driver spending 4–6 hours a day on the platform hits a p95 experience multiple times a week — not once in a while
- Uber is the largest single source of work in the world: 5.6 million active earners, more than the largest employers
- The new framing: higher duty of care, slower development cycles, more humility, direct listening
- If Uber builds the best platform for earners, it wins structurally — lower churn, better service, better liquidity
- The goal Dara wants to be proud of: a tech company genuinely connected to the broad working population, not just elite consumers
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.