Original source details coming soon.
The technology supercycle: AI, sensors, and biotech converging
Executive overview
Three general-purpose technologies — AI, advanced sensors, and biotechnology — are converging in ways most businesses and governments aren't tracking. Improvements in each one accelerate the others, creating a compounding flywheel effect. Most organisations see these as separate domains; the strategic risk lies in that blind spot.
The convergence of AI, sensors, and biotech is the signal most organisations are missing.
The three general-purpose technologies
- General-purpose technologies (GPTs) have profound, lasting economic impact — like the steam engine, electricity, and the internet
- AI qualifies as a GPT; so do advanced sensor technology and biotechnology
- Advanced sensors provide behavioral and real-world data that LLMs alone can't access — enabling large action models that predict human behavior
- Synthetic and generative biology lets you prompt for molecular structures or biological functions, just as ChatGPT generates text
- Improvements in one GPT beget improvements in the others — the convergence is the insight
Why convergence matters for every industry
- An investment banker or media company is as exposed to biotech disruption as a pharma company
- Cultured meat (grown from a 2g tissue sample in a bioreactor) is already on sale in Singapore — geo-economic implications ripple across supply chains, protein access, and cold chains
- Nitrile gloves, synthetic materials, weight-loss drugs: all products of AI-biotech convergence
- Sensor data unlocks behavioral layers unavailable to public-data-trained models — and is mostly held by OEMs and tech companies
- "Living intelligence" is the term Webb's team uses for what comes next after this convergence matures
Making foresight actionable
- Being aware of the supercycle isn't enough — organisations must build strategic foresight capabilities
- Track signals and distinguish them from trends; map uncertainties (what you can't know) separately
- Use scenarios to navigate uncertainty — not probabilistic tables, but vivid, concrete stories
- Herman Kahn's nuclear aftermath stories worked because they were visceral and immediately relevant to decision-makers
- Data-backed scenarios create the confidence leaders need to act; passion without data doesn't pass muster
On regulation and governance
- Heavy-handed regulation produces lawsuits, not compliance — the EU is already demonstrating this
- Regulation is inherently reactive; it can't keep pace with technologies whose trajectories are still uncertain
- Biology can't be geofenced — enforcement mechanisms for generative biology are structurally harder than for software
- Webb's alternative: a data trust model where participants share data and benefit collectively; non-participants are economically excluded
- Look outside your competitive set — near-peers and adjacent industries almost always have analogous frameworks worth adapting
Founder and leader implications
- Startups should study convergence points — that's where new businesses emerge
- Healthcare is the most vulnerable sector to disruption from this supercycle and the most urgent to rethink
- Founders fixated on exit make decisions misaligned with building something great
- The future isn't fixed — strategic moves made now compound into advantage within a year
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.