The original is one click away. Open original ↗
Solitude as a leadership tool: how quiet thinking sharpens decisions
Executive overview
Leaders today face relentless information overload, constant connectivity, and shrinking space for independent thought. The result is reactive decision-making and misaligned effort.
Solitude is not a luxury — it is the mechanism through which leaders establish clarity, access intuition, generate creative solutions, build moral courage, and maintain emotional balance.
Mike Erwin, co-author of Lead Yourself First, draws on seven years of research and interviews with leaders across military, political, and nonprofit contexts to show that deliberate solitude is a repeatable leadership practice — not a personality trait of introverts.
The four benefits of solitude
- Clarity: deep, uninterrupted thought is the only path to the most rigorous analysis the brain can produce
- Intuition: quieting the mind allows instincts and pattern-recognition to surface — the complement to analytical thinking
- Creativity: disconnection from inputs creates the conditions for connecting dots and generating non-obvious solutions
- Moral courage: structured reflection before difficult decisions builds the resolve to act on them
- Emotional balance: solitude provides space to process pressure before it distorts judgment
Historical leaders who used solitude deliberately
- Dwight Eisenhower — an extreme extrovert who rose from lieutenant colonel to Supreme Allied Commander in three years; combated meeting overload by writing memorandums to himself, fleshing out decisions on paper before major choices, including D-Day
- Abraham Lincoln — wrote an unsent letter to General Meade after Gettysburg expressing frustration at his failure to pursue Lee; the act of writing discharged the emotion, restored perspective, and prevented a damaging confrontation; he returned to his normal leadership composure within days
- Martin Luther King Jr. — arrived in Montgomery at 25, reluctant to lead the Bus Boycott; after receiving a death threat in January 1956, sat alone at his kitchen table in the early hours of the morning; rose having resolved his commitment to the cause and never wavered again
Solitude in high-stakes operational contexts
- Erwin served as an intelligence officer in Afghanistan (2006–2009), processing signals and human intelligence across half a theater
- Used solitude in two distinct modes: active hard thinking to make sense of information, and disengaged runs or walks to quiet the brain
- Both modes were essential — situation determined which was needed
- The stakes made finding those pockets non-negotiable, not aspirational
Active vs. passive solitude
- Active: structured, deliberate thinking on a specific problem — the "heavy lifting" mode
- Passive: disconnecting from inputs entirely, allowing the mind to wander — feeds intuition and creativity
- Neither is superior; the situation determines the right approach
- Leaders who practice both get the full range of benefits
The modern challenge
- Volume of meetings, email, social media, and text has risen sharply over the past decade
- The boundary between work and personal time has collapsed — leaders can be "on" at midnight
- Solitude now requires a deliberate decision, not just an absence of stimulation
- Even researchers and advocates of solitude — including Erwin himself — struggle to maintain the practice consistently
Practical starting points
- Start small: 10–15 minute pockets are sufficient to begin
- Specific low-barrier opportunities: drive to or from work without radio, go for a walk without headphones, eat lunch alone without a phone, close the door for 15 quiet minutes
- Disconnecting the phone during evening hours changes orientation even if the phone is never checked
- The goal is not a week-long silent retreat — it is scheduled white space on the calendar, followed through
- Leaders who practice it consistently report clearer thinking, better decisions, and stronger presence with others
Learning from personal failure
- Erwin founded Team Red, White and Blue — a nonprofit with 130,000 members helping veterans reintegrate into civilian life
- During a period of rapid growth, while still on active duty and moving between postings, he failed to delegate and institute the processes the organisation needed
- He attributes the setback directly to abandoning solitude during that period — too much pace, not enough reflection
- The failure reinforced the book's thesis from the inside: the practice he was researching was the practice he had stopped doing
More like this — when you're ready for early access.
Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.