Solitude as a leadership tool: how quiet thinking sharpens decisions

Executive overview

Leaders today face relentless information overload, constant connectivity, and shrinking space for independent thought. The result is reactive decision-making and misaligned effort.

Solitude is not a luxury — it is the mechanism through which leaders establish clarity, access intuition, generate creative solutions, build moral courage, and maintain emotional balance.

Mike Erwin, co-author of Lead Yourself First, draws on seven years of research and interviews with leaders across military, political, and nonprofit contexts to show that deliberate solitude is a repeatable leadership practice — not a personality trait of introverts.

The four benefits of solitude

  • Clarity: deep, uninterrupted thought is the only path to the most rigorous analysis the brain can produce
  • Intuition: quieting the mind allows instincts and pattern-recognition to surface — the complement to analytical thinking
  • Creativity: disconnection from inputs creates the conditions for connecting dots and generating non-obvious solutions
  • Moral courage: structured reflection before difficult decisions builds the resolve to act on them
  • Emotional balance: solitude provides space to process pressure before it distorts judgment

Historical leaders who used solitude deliberately

  • Dwight Eisenhower — an extreme extrovert who rose from lieutenant colonel to Supreme Allied Commander in three years; combated meeting overload by writing memorandums to himself, fleshing out decisions on paper before major choices, including D-Day
  • Abraham Lincoln — wrote an unsent letter to General Meade after Gettysburg expressing frustration at his failure to pursue Lee; the act of writing discharged the emotion, restored perspective, and prevented a damaging confrontation; he returned to his normal leadership composure within days
  • Martin Luther King Jr. — arrived in Montgomery at 25, reluctant to lead the Bus Boycott; after receiving a death threat in January 1956, sat alone at his kitchen table in the early hours of the morning; rose having resolved his commitment to the cause and never wavered again

Solitude in high-stakes operational contexts

  • Erwin served as an intelligence officer in Afghanistan (2006–2009), processing signals and human intelligence across half a theater
  • Used solitude in two distinct modes: active hard thinking to make sense of information, and disengaged runs or walks to quiet the brain
  • Both modes were essential — situation determined which was needed
  • The stakes made finding those pockets non-negotiable, not aspirational

Active vs. passive solitude

  • Active: structured, deliberate thinking on a specific problem — the "heavy lifting" mode
  • Passive: disconnecting from inputs entirely, allowing the mind to wander — feeds intuition and creativity
  • Neither is superior; the situation determines the right approach
  • Leaders who practice both get the full range of benefits

The modern challenge

  • Volume of meetings, email, social media, and text has risen sharply over the past decade
  • The boundary between work and personal time has collapsed — leaders can be "on" at midnight
  • Solitude now requires a deliberate decision, not just an absence of stimulation
  • Even researchers and advocates of solitude — including Erwin himself — struggle to maintain the practice consistently

Practical starting points

  • Start small: 10–15 minute pockets are sufficient to begin
  • Specific low-barrier opportunities: drive to or from work without radio, go for a walk without headphones, eat lunch alone without a phone, close the door for 15 quiet minutes
  • Disconnecting the phone during evening hours changes orientation even if the phone is never checked
  • The goal is not a week-long silent retreat — it is scheduled white space on the calendar, followed through
  • Leaders who practice it consistently report clearer thinking, better decisions, and stronger presence with others

Learning from personal failure

  • Erwin founded Team Red, White and Blue — a nonprofit with 130,000 members helping veterans reintegrate into civilian life
  • During a period of rapid growth, while still on active duty and moving between postings, he failed to delegate and institute the processes the organisation needed
  • He attributes the setback directly to abandoning solitude during that period — too much pace, not enough reflection
  • The failure reinforced the book's thesis from the inside: the practice he was researching was the practice he had stopped doing

More like this — when you're ready for early access.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Get early access to the full library.

Join the waitlist for a personal account and content recommendations based on what you're working on.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.

Be among the first to get personalised recommendations tailored to your stage in business.

No spam.

You're on the list. We'll be in touch before launch.